Integrity Legal

We discuss the K1 visa on this blog frequently. A K2 visa is a derivative child visa designed for the child of a beneficiary of a K1 fiance visa. Under the government interpretation of US Immigration law. Children in the United States of America on a K2 visa who fail to adjust their status before the age of 21 “age out,” and must leave the country, apply for a new visa, and then return to the USA on an Immigrant visa. Unfortunately, this system can result in a delay of months or years for the would-be K2 visa beneficiary as Immigrant visa applications for the 21 year old step children of US Citizens can take as long as 3-5 years to be adjudicated. At the time of this writing, the case known as In Re Qiyu Zhang is pending in the US court system and could change this rule.

Advocates for United States Immigration reform await the outcome of this case with great anticipation as a favorable opinion would provide many new benefits to the children of American Immigrants. The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) has filed a brief in support of ending the “age out” interpretation of the K visa statute. To quote the American Immigration Lawyer’s Association directly:

“[T]he only reasonable interpretation of the K visa provisions is that Congress intended that a K-2 visa beneficiary be able to adjust status within the U.S. even after turning 21. Any other interpretation produces absurd results. Congress explicitly provided that the child of a fiancé(e) K-1 visa holder was eligible for a K-2 visa and admission to the U.S. up until he or she turned 21. Under DHS’ interpretation, K-2 beneficiaries …who are admitted to the U.S. shortly before their 21st birthday, and who thus have insufficient time to complete the adjustment process, must immediately depart the U.S. upon turning 21. Congress certainly did not intend for some K-2 visa beneficiaries to be restricted to a visit to the U.S. – in some cases, for only a matter of days – the result that flows inevitably from DHS’s interpretation of the statute. Instead, as demonstrated below, the statute can and must be interpreted to allow all K-2 visa holders, no matter their age after admission, a viable path to adjust to lawful permanent residence status.”

This writer concurs with the opinion in the aforementioned brief as K2 beneficiaries should be allowed to adjust staus even after they have turned 21. Even though the K2 could technically be considered a dual intent travel document, the primary reason for its use is for children to travel to the US and adjust status. In this case, denying Immigration benefits due to age is too arbitrary and failure to adjust status because one reaches the age of 21 violates the spirit of the K visa statute.

Tags: Add new tag, Adjustment of Status, Adjustment of Status Thailand, Fiance Visa, Fiance Visa Thailand, Fiancee Visa, Fiancee Visa Thailand, K-1 Visa, K-1 Visa Thailand, K-2 Visa, K1 Visa, K1 Visa Thailand, K2 adjustment of status, K2 Visa, k2 visa thailand, US Visa, US Visa Thailand
Posted in Adjustment of Status, Fiance Visa Thailand, K1 Visa, K1 Visa Thailand, Legal Opinion, US Visa and Immigration, US Visa Thailand, USCIS | No Comments »

Although it is not an issue which most people wish to think about, the fact remains that each year many people are denied United States Immigration benefits. From Thailand, it is not entirely uncommon to see Thai nationals with improper documentation being turned away at the US port of entry. In many cases, those trying to enter the USA are given the opportunity to exercise the option to voluntarily depart the United States.

The legal act of Voluntary departure allows an alien, who could otherwise be deported or removed, to leave the United States of America at their own cost within a specified period of time and thereby avert an order of deportation or removal.  That being said, in certain cases voluntary departure is not a viable legal option.

Voluntarily departing the United States of America is more desirable from an Immigration standpoint when compared to being forced to leave the USA pursuant to an order of deportation.  Should an immigrant (or non-immigrant) be subjected to an order of removal (deportation) he or she might be precluded from coming back the United States of America for as long as a decade and could be subject to criminal and civil sanctions if he or she reenters without first obtaining appropriate legal authorization.  Should the immigrant depart the United States voluntarily within the time frame ordered by the judge or offered by the Immigration officer, then he or she will not be estopped from legally reentry to the United states at some point in the future. It should be noted that a person who has a removal order on his or her record is not allowed to apply for removal cancellation, adjustment of status and/or any other United States immigration benefits for certain statutorily prescribed periods.

Cases involving voluntary departure often arise when a Thai is using an improper visa to try to enter the US. This is especially common for those who try to use a US tourist visa, but have obvious immigrant intent. For instance, Thai women who are going to the the United States on a US tourist visa to visit their fiancee could be turned away because the Immigration officer feels they should obtain a K1 visa for such a purpose.  Technically, Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) have the authority to put the prospective entrant through expedited deportation, but in some cases they will simply allow the visa holder to depart of their own volition.

In order to forestall the need for voluntary departure, to avoid the possibility of expedited deportation, and simply to be ethical, it is never wise to dishonestly apply for a US tourist visa, student visa, US business visa, or Exchange visitor visa when the applicant intends to travel to the USA for the purposes of marriage and adjustment of status.

(This is not to be used as competent advice on the law. No attorney-client relationship should be inferred from reading this piece.)

Tags: American Visa Thailand, Fiancee Visa, Immigration rules, K1 Visa, K1 Visa Thailand, US Tourist Visa, US Visa, US Visa Thailand
Posted in F1 Visa Thailand, J1 Visa Thailand, K1 Visa Thailand, US Visa and Immigration, US Visa Thailand | No Comments »

Adjustment of status is necessary after a beneficiary enters the USA and marries the K-1 visa petitioner. Adjustment of Status requires the filing of an I-485 application.

The Difference between “Adjustment of Status” and “Change of Status”

Many people going through the travails of Immigration procedure confuse “adjustment of status,” with “change of status.” In common vernacular the terms are similar, if not synonymous. However, in the context of US Immigration they have different meanings entirely.  If an alien adjusts status, this means that the alien changes from a non-immigrant visa category to an Immigrant visa category and is therefore accorded Lawful Permanent Residence (a Green Card). If a person present in the USA “changes status,” this means that they convert from one non-immigrant visa category to another.

K-1 Visas and Adjustment

As a hybrid visa, the K-1 allows an alien to enter the USA with the intent to marry an American and obtain a
Green Card. While the Green Card application is pending, the alien spouse is permitted to stay stateside. In fact, the alien spouse should not subsequently depart the US without first getting an advance parole travel document. Failure to obtain advance parole will very likely result in a K-1 visa conferee’s petition being canceled.

Provided the alien fiancee remains in status in the United States and the Adjustment of Status is approved, then lawful permanent residence will be conferred. This permanent residence will be conditional for 2 years. 3 months prior to the 2nd anniversary of adjustment, the couple should file for an I-751 removal of conditions of residence in the United States. After the removal of conditions occurs the alien will able to remain a resident unconditionally.

Appeals of Negative Adjustment of Status Decisions

In a situation where the adjustment of status from K-1 to Lawful Permanent Residence has not been approved, the decision can be appealed. Also appeals can be made pursuant to Section 586 of Public Law 106-429 if the appellant meets the requirements set forth in the rules.  Any appeal of an adverse adjustment ruling should be submitted to the Administrative Appeals Unit (AAU) for review. As a general rule, the applicant who has been denied adjustment must appeal within Thirty-Three days of the Immigration Judge’s ruling. Upon receipt of the appeal application and remittance of processing fee the appeal is forwarded to the Board of Immigration Appeals in the US Capital for review and adjudication.

(It should be noted that an appeal should not be confused with a waiver. In cases where a legal ground of inadmissibility is found to exist, the consular officer’s decision is not subject to appeal, but instead a waiver may be obtained.)

Nothing Contained herein should be viewed  as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional. Obligations inherent to an attorney-client relationship are not to be assumed to arise simply from reading this post due to the fact that no such relationship exists between the author and reader.

Tags: Adjustment of Status, American Visa, change of status, Fiancee Visa, Immigration appeal, Inadmissibility, K-1 Visa, K1 Visa Thailand, US Immigration, Waiver, waiver of inadmissibility
Posted in Adjustment of Status, K1 Visa Thailand | No Comments »

What is Advance Parole?

It is an immigration travel document conferred by the USA.

Unlike a re-entry  permit, advance parole is granted to those who have yet to obtain lawful permanent resident status.  For the purposes of this post we will discuss advance parole with regard to the K1 Visa. Since the K1 Visa is a non-immigrant single entry visa  advance parole may be a necessity if one enters the United States and would like to subsequently leave after entry with permission to return upon the same visa. This is especially important in terms of adjustment of status. When a Thai spouse enters the USA on a K1 Visa she must adjust status in order to obtain lawful permanent residence (a “Green Card,” to use the colloquial term). Should she leave the US while the adjustment is still processing, her adjustment application will be canceled and the visa process will have to start all over again in order for her to re-enter the USA. Therefore, advance parole is a very important concept in terms of US Family Immigration. (Although a K-3 Visa is a non-immigrant visa it is a multiple entry visa so the issues of advance parole aren’t as important)

Advance Parole and US Possessions and Territories

In previous articles about advance parole, I have written about my hesitance to advise those in the USA on a K1 Visa to travel to certain possessions of the United States. I still renew this caution, but I believe some clarification of the travel issue can be found in the definition of “United States” found at 8 CFR Chapter 12 Subchapter 1 § 1101 (a) (38):

“The term “United States”, except as otherwise specifically herein provided, when used in a geographical sense, means the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin Islands of the United States.”

This definition begs the question, “What about other possessions of the United States?”

Advance Parole Document

The United States is also in possession of : American Samoa, Palau, the Northern Marianas Islands, and the Marshall Islands. The United States is also in a compact of Free Association with the Federated States of Micronesia. It would appear from the definition of “United States,” provided in the Immigration and Nationality Act that one would need to obtain advance parole in order to travel to any of these minor US outlying possessions because they are not part of the United States for the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

I think it may be wise to look at issues of advance parole on a spectrum:

Travel within the 50 US States: No need for Advance Parole

Travel to Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, or Guam after entry into the US on a K1 Visa: it would appear that one can travel to these possessions, but there may be an issue because these territories are not technically within the USA. I would strongly recommend against traveling to these locations (unless absolutely necessary and after consultation with a competent US visa lawyer in your jurisdiction)  until after the adjustment of status process is complete.

Travel to American Samoa, Palau, the Northern Marianas Islands, and the Marshall Islands: Pursuant to the INA’s definition of “United States” it would be highly inadvisable to travel to one of these places without first obtaining advance parole because these locations do not fall within the definition of “United States,” as the author reads it.

Travel to any other state not mentioned above: Advance parole a definite necessity.

Hopefully, this post has shed some light upon this subject, but as always, do not use any of the above as a substitute or in any way in lieu of legal advice from a competent licensed attorney with experience in US Immigration matters.

Tags: advance parole, Fiance Visa, Fiancee Visa, K1 Visa, us embassy bangkok, US Visa, us visa lawyer
Posted in US Visa and Immigration | 5 Comments »