Integrity Legal
- Legal Blog
- Integrity Legal Home
- Thai Visa
- Company in Thailand
- Real Estate Thailand
- US Visa
- Contact Us
Archive for the ‘US Consulate Chiang Mai’ Category
26th MAY 2010
Consular Processing Fees to Increase on June 4, 2010
Posted by : admin
In recent postings on this blog, this author has discussed proposed fee increases for Consular services at US Embassies and Consulates outside of the United States of America. Recently the American State Department made the following announcement:
The Department is increasing fees to ensure sufficient resources to cover the rising cost of processing nonimmigrant visas. This increase applies both to nonimmigrant visas placed in passports and to border crossing cards issued to certain applicants in Mexico. The new, tiered fee structure was created to cover the higher unit costs for processing certain categories of nonimmigrant visas that are more complicated and require more in-depth consideration than most other categories of nonimmigrant visas. The Department is required to recover, as far as possible, the cost of processing nonimmigrant visas through the collection of the application fees. For a number of reasons, including new security enhancements, the $131 fee set on January 1, 2008 no longer covers the current, actual cost of processing nonimmigrant visas. Under the new schedule of fees, applicants for all visas that are not petition-based, including B1/B2 tourist and business visitor visas and all student and exchange visitor (F, M and J) visas, will pay a fee of $140. Applicants for petition-based visas will pay an application fee of $150. These categories include:
· H visa for temporary workers and trainees
· L visa for intracompany transferees
· O visa for aliens with extraordinary ability
· P visa for athletes, artists and entertainers
· Q visa for international cultural exchange visitors
· R visa for religious occupations
The application fee for K visas for fiancé(e)s of U.S. citizens will be $350. The fee for E visas for treaty-traders and treaty investors will be $390.
The last portion of this announcement is of the most pressing concern to those wishing to bring a Thai loved one to the USA. Many Americans opt to use a K1 visa to bring a Thai fiancee to the United States. In the past, many also utilized the K3 Visa to bring Thai spouses to the USA. At the time of this writing the National Visa Center (under the authority of the Department of State) is administratively closing all I-129f petitions for K3 Visas if the underlying I-130 petition has been submitted to the NVC concurrently with, or prior to, the submission of the I-129f petition. Therefore, the increase in fees is unlikely to have a major impact upon those seeking a US marriage visa as the vast majority of US Marriage visas being processed out of any US Consulate or US Embassy are immigrant visas (CR1 or IR1) rather than non-immigrant K3 visas.
For further general information about US Immigration from Thailand please see: Fiance Visa Thailand.
17th MAY 2010
Please be advised that the following was posted on the official website of the United States Embassy in Bangkok, Thailand:
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT
U.S. Embassy Consular Section Closed May 17 - May 21, 2010
Due to continuing security concerns in the area and access issues on Wireless Road, the U.S. Embassy is currently operating under emergency personnel staffing only. The Non-immigrant and Immigrant Visa sections will be closed until May 21, 2010. If you have a non-immigrant visa interview appointment scheduled for the period between May 17 to May 21, 2010, your appointment will be rescheduled. As a resolution to the ongoing security situation in the vicinity of the U.S. Embassy is uncertain, it is not currently possible to establish a new appointment time for those impacted by our unscheduled closure. As soon as the U.S. Embassy has determined the situation to be safe for Embassy Consular staff to return to work and for visa applicants to travel to the Embassy for visa appointments, we will advise those impacted through e-mail or phone with details on new appointment dates. Please Note: As a large number of people have been affected by these events, and the volume of appointments that have been scheduled for the upcoming weeks, it will not be possible to consider expedited appointments. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this has caused.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can I reschedule my appointment?
At present, we must ask applicants with visa appointments scheduled for the week of May 17 through May 21 to wait until the Embassy has determined when that it is safe to conduct visa appointments. All those impacted by this unexpected closure will be notified through the e-mail address or phone number provided during the visa interview appointment process.
I have a visa appointment scheduled during the week of May 17-May 21. I have urgent travel to the United States, what can I do?
Unfortunately, due to the current security situation, the U.S. Embassy Consular Section is currently closed. We are unable to schedule any visa appointments for the week of May 17-May 21 and will be unable to accommodate expedited appointments. We suggest that you make alternate travel plans.
I have a visa appointment scheduled during the week of May 17-May 21. Can I reschedule my appointment at another U.S. Embassy in a neighboring country?
Each U.S. Embassy has its own scheduling system and requirements for visa applicants. Fees paid in Thailand for the visa interview cannot be used abroad.
I have a visa appointment scheduled during the week of May 17-May 21. Can I reschedule my appointment for the U.S. Consulate General in Chiang Mai?
The U.S. Consulate General in Chiang Mai has its own appointment system and you must live within their consular district to schedule an appointment there. Please see http://chiangmai.usconsulate.gov/ for more information.
I have a visa appointment scheduled during the week of May 17-May 21. Can I make a special request?
Due to the current security situation, the U.S. Embassy Consular Section will be closed for the week of May 17 – May 21. As such, we will be unable to reply to visa inquiries and/or special requests during that period. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience our disruption of service has caused.
I am an immigrant visa applicant – can I come in for my scheduled appointment, to drop off documents, or to pick up my visa?
If you had/have an immigrant visa appointment for the week of May 14-May 21, it will be rescheduled. You will be contacted with a new date and time once the Embassy reopens. If you have been told to bring in documents on Mondays or Wednesdays, or to come in to pick up your visa, please do not come in until the Embassy reopens. Please look for announcements on the Embassy website.
Meanwhile, the situation on the ground in Bangkok remains tenuous, to quote The Nation’s website:
Thailand teetered yesterday between a last chance for peace and what could be even bigger urban warfare than has already occurred these past few days. It all hinges on behind-the-scenes talks reportedly taking place and whether increasingly uncontrollable pockets of angry protesters can be reined in.The casualty toll slowed its climb a bit during the day, but many observers believed the night could explode into something worse than the wee hours of yesterday morning.
The conclusion of this dramatic series of events remains, at the time of this writing, unclear. However, all hope that the conflict will be resolved with no further loss of life.
For more information about this unfolding state of affairs please see: US Embassy Bangkok or US Embassy Thailand.
13th MAY 2010
The following message was posted on the website of the United States Embassy in the Kingdom of Thailand:
Warden Message: Embassy Closed Friday, May 14; Update on Possible Outages in Bangkok
(May 13, 2010) This warden message alerts U.S. citizens traveling to and residing in Thailand that the Royal Thai Government through the Center for the Resolution of the Emergency Situation (CRES) has announced its plans to close off the demonstration area at the Ratchaprasong rally site in an attempt to disperse the protesters. We understand that beginning today, May 13, at 6:00 p.m., authorities will take the following measures:
–limit transportation services, including the BTS Skytrain, MRTA, canal routes, and possibly bus routes.
–set up check points at all access routes to control and limit access to the rally site. For details on what routes may be affected, please refer to local media.
–cut off electricity, water, and telephone to the rally site and possibly surrounding areas. It is currently unclear how large an area will be affected. It is also unclear how the UDD will respond.
The U.S. Embassy, including visa operations, will be closed tomorrow, Friday, May 14. American Citizen Services (ACS) will be available for emergencies only. If at all possible, the U.S. Embassy recommends against coming to this area on May 14. If U.S. citizens currently have appointments with ACS for May 14, you may go online or call us at 02-205-4049 to reschedule.
U.S. citizens should avoid travel to and lodging in this area and the areas in and around all demonstrations, if possible. If U.S. citizens must travel to these areas, they should exercise special caution and remain vigilant with regard to their personal security. U.S. Embassy personnel who live around this area have been given the option to relocate to housing outside of the affected area until the situation is resolved. U.S. citizens are reminded to exercise caution and vigilance at all times.
The United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (aka UDD or “red-shirts”) continues to demonstrate in central Bangkok. The UDD may change or expand their demonstration locations at any time. Various other groups are engaging in pro-government or counter-demonstrations. There have been several clashes between the security forces and the UDD and other demonstrators. These clashes may escalate with no warning. For areas currently affected by demonstrations, please refer to local media. These demonstrations are expected to continue in Bangkok indefinitely.
U.S. citizens are reminded that even demonstrations intended to be peaceful can turn confrontational and escalate into violence with little or no warning. U.S. citizens are urged to avoid the areas that may be targeted for demonstrations and to exercise caution in their movements around Bangkok.
The Department strongly encourages U.S. citizens in Thailand to register with the Consular Section of the U.S. Embassy in Bangkok or through the State Department’s travel registration website. For information on general crime and security issues, U.S. citizens may also consult the Department of State’s Country Specific Information for Thailand and the Worldwide Caution, located at the Department of State’s Bureau of Consular Affairs website. U.S. citizens may also obtain up-to-date information on security conditions by calling 1-888-407-4747 from the United States and Canada, or 202-501-4444 from overseas.
The American Citizen Services section of the U.S. Embassy Bangkok is located at 95 Wireless Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. The American Citizen Services Unit of the U.S. Embassy can be reached by calling 66-2-205-4049 and by e-mail at acsbkk@state.gov. The emergency after-hours telephone number is 66-2-205-4000.
The U.S. Consulate General in Chiang Mai is located at 387 Wichayanond Road in Chiang Mai. The American Citizen Services Unit of the Consulate General can be reached by calling 66-53-107-777 and by e-mail at acschn@state.gov. The after-hours emergency telephone number is 66-81-881-1878.
For information about attorney assistance with Consular Processing in visa matters please see other pages on this website or click here: US Embassy Thailand or US Embassy.
4th MAY 2010
ในกระทู้ก่อนๆ เราได้พูดกันถึงเรื่องกฎภายในของ NVC ที่เปลี่ยนไป NVC ประกาศว่าให้มีผลตั้งแต่ วันที่ 1 กุมภาพันธ์ 2553 NVC จะไม่ดำเนินการเกี่ยวกับคำขอ I 129F ที่เกี่ยวกับวีซ่าคู่สมรสอีกต่อไปหากว่า คำขอ I-130 มาถึง NVC ก่อนหรือพร้อมกับคำขอ I 129F มีคนที่สงสัยว่าจะมีผลต่อผู้ขอวีซ่าอย่างไร สำหรับคนที่จะขอวีซ่า เค ทรี ผลของประกาศนี้สำคัญมากเพราะในหลายๆเคส NVC จะเรียกให้ผู้ที่ต้องการขอวีซ่าคู่สมรสถาวรขอวีซ่าคู่สมรสเช่น IR1 หรือ CR1 แทนที่จะเป็นวีซ่าทางด่วนแบบ เค ทรี อย่างไรก็ตามมีบางคนข้องใจว่าเรื่องนี้จะมีผลต่อวีซ่าคู่หมั้นอย่างไร
เพื่อขอวีซ่าคู่หมั้น บุคคลสัญชาติอเมริกันต้องยื่นคำขอ I-129F สำหรับวีซ่าเค วัน เมื่อคำขอได้รับการอนุมัติแล้ว จะถูกส่งต่อไปยัง NVC เพื่อตรวจสอบทางความมั่นคง หลังจากที่ตรวจสอบเสร็จเรียบร้อย จะถูกส่งต่อไปยังสถานทูตสหรัฐหรือกงสุลสหรัฐที่มีเขตอำนาจ ซึ่งก็อาจจะมีความสับสนเกิดขึ้นเนื่องจากบางคนอาจจะเข้าใจว่าคำขอ I 129F นั้นถูกยกเลิกสำหรับกรณีวีซ่าคู่หมั้นด้วย ซึ่งเรื่องนี้ไม่เป็นความจริงเนื่องจากการยกเลิกคำขอ I 129F นั้นเกิดขึ้นเฉพาะกับกรณีวีซ่า เค ทรี ไม่ใช่ วีซ่าเค วัน การเปลี่ยนแปลงที่ว่าไม่มีผลกับการขอวีซ่าเควันแต่อย่างใดเพราะกฎนี้มีขึ้นเพื่อเปลี่ยนแปลงการขอวีซ่าเค ทรี โดยเฉพาะ
ข้อดีของการพัฒนาในครั้งนี้ก็คือ NVC สามารถนำทรัพยากรบุคคลที่ดูแลเรื่องคำขอ I 129F สำหรับวีซ่าเค ทรี มาใช้ดูแลวีซ่าถาวรหรือวีซ่าคู่หมั้นก็เป็นได้ นั้นหมายความว่า ในความคิดเห็นของผู้เขียนนั้น ขั้นตอนการดำเนินการของวีซ่า เค วันนั้นค่อนข้างมีประสิทธิภาพยู่แล้ว และ NVC มักใช้เวลาไม่นานในการดำเนินการวีซ่าเค วัน ในเคสส่วนใหญ่ที่ดำเนินการโดยสถานทูตสหรัฐ ประจำประเทศไทย จะมีระยะเวลาการรอประมาณ 2 สัปดาห์ระหว่างที่ คำขอ I 129F ได้รับอนุมัติแล้วโดย USCIS และถูกส่งต่อจาก NVC มายังสถานทูต สำหรับคนทั่วๆไปก็เป็นระยะเวลาที่รอได้ และในกรณีวีซ่าถาวร ขั้นตอน NVC อาจจะนานขึ้นนิดหน่อยเนื่องจาก NVC ต้องการเอกสารมากขึ้นสำหรับวีซ่าถาวร เมื่อเทียบกับวีซ่าไม่อพยพ
For more information in English please see K1 visa or Fiance Visa Thailand.
2nd MAY 2010
President Obama Makes Statement On US Immigration Reform
Posted by : admin
The issue of Comprehensive Immigration Reform seems to be more hotly debated as the mid-term Congressional elections in the United States approach. Recently, President Barack Obama was quoted as saying:
What has become increasingly clear is that we can no longer wait to fix our broken immigration system, which Democrats and Republicans alike agree doesn’t work. It’s unacceptable to have 11 million people in the United States who are living here illegally and outside of the system. I have repeatedly said that there are some essential components that must be in immigration legislation. It must call for stronger border security measures, tougher penalties for employers who hire illegal immigrants and clearer rules for controlling future immigration. And it must require those who are here illegally to get right with the law, pay penalties and taxes, learn English, pass criminal background checks and admit responsibility before they are allowed to get in line and eventually earn citizenship. The outline presented today includes many of these elements. The next critical step is to iron out the details of a bill. We welcome that discussion, and my Administration will play an active role in engaging partners on both sides of the aisle to work toward a bipartisan solution that is based on the fundamental concept of accountability that the American people expect and deserve.
Many argue that the United States Immigration system needs to be modified as it is proving to be too inflexible when it comes to dealing with some of the important immigration problems of the day. A case in point is the debate on Same Sex US Immigration benefits for bi-national couples. At present, same-sex bi-national couples cannot receive the same family immigration benefits as different sex couples due to provisions in the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). In short these couples cannot receive a same sex marriage visa. Many hope that by placing specific legislative language akin to the provisions of the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) into the Comprehensive Immigration bill this policy of providing disproportionate benefits will come to an end.
Overall, the current immigration system has improved for those seeking immediate relative immigration benefits (IR1, CR1, IR2, etc). For example, the National Visa Center has begun administratively closing K3 Visa applications as the need for such expedited travel documents is felt to be no longer necessary for those seeking immigrant benefits since USCIS no longer has a high backlog for such petitions. The K1 visa is still processing in the same manner as it has in the past. However, some of the preference petition categories are still processing quite slowly. Also, this brief assessment does not look at employment based immigration issues associated with visa categories such as the L1 visa and the E2 visa nor does it begin to tackle to issue of undocumented workers and immigrants in the USA.
For further information on this issue please see: Fiance Visa Thailand.
1st MAY 2010
On this blog, we try to provide up to date information regarding the processing time estimates of certain family based, and in limited instances non-family based, United States Immigration Petitions.
Below are the current processing time estimates from the USCIS Service Center in California as of February 28, 2010:
| I-129F | Petition for Alien Fiance(e) | K-1/K-2 - Not yet married - fiance and/or dependent child | 5 Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| I-129F | Petition for Alien Fiance(e) | K-3/K-4 - Already married - spouse and/or dependent child | 5 Months |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a spouse, parent, or child under 21 | 5 Months |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for an unmarried son or daughter over 21 | July 09, 2005 |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a married son or daughter over 21 | May 24, 2002 |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a brother or sister | March 02, 2001 |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | Permanent resident filling for a spouse or child under 21 | June 02, 2007 |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | Permanent resident filling for an unmarried son or daughter over 21 | March 02, 2003 |
| I-131 | Application for Travel Document | All other applicants for advance parole | 3 Months |
| I-129 | Petition for A Nonimmigrant Worker | E - Treaty traders and investors | 2 Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| I-129 | Petition for A Nonimmigrant Worker | L - Intracompany transfers | 1 Month |
The following are processing time estimates for the USCIS Vermont Service Center as of February 28, 2010:
| I-129F | Petition for Alien Fiance(e) | K-1/K-2 - Not yet married - fiance and/or dependent child | 5 Months |
|---|---|---|---|
| I-129F | Petition for Alien Fiance(e) | K-3/K-4 - Already married - spouse and/or dependent child | 5 Months |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a spouse, parent, or child under 21 | 5 Months |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for an unmarried son or daughter over 21 | February 13, 2009 |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a married son or daughter over 21 | January 23, 2009 |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a brother or sister | January 16, 2009 |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | Permanent resident filling for a spouse or child under 21 | November 05, 2008 |
| I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | Permanent resident filling for an unmarried son or daughter over 21 | February 27, 2009 |
| I-131 | Application for Travel Document | All other applicants for advance parole | 3 Months |
| I-129 | Petition for A Nonimmigrant Worker | L - Intracompany transfers | 1 Month |
|---|
These estimates should not be viewed as accurate for each individual case as each case is unique and some cases take more time to process through the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) and others may take considerably little time to process through the Service Center. In any case, the assistance of a US Visa Lawyer can be helpful to clients as an authorized representative is entitled to correspond with USCIS on behalf of clients and can thereby streamline the overall visa process.
It should be noted that these estimates do not include the time that it takes to get the case processed through a US Embassy or US Consulate overseas. For those processing a Thai case, it usually takes about 6-8 weeks to process through the US Embassy Thailand.
For further information please see: Fiance Visa Thailand.
30th APR 2010
US Lawyer Thailand: Confidentiality Issues
Posted by : admin
Repeatedly, this author uses this blog as a platform to try to educate the public regarding the US visa process and the problems that can arise during that process. In many cases, people are simply unaware of the rules regarding US visa issuance and this blog attempts to provide relevant information that readers may find beneficial. That being said, another frequently discussed topic is the unauthorized practice of law by “visa companies” and “visa agents” or those claiming to be American attorneys. This is not simply a tirade against such practices, but is intended to provide information regarding the detrimental impact that these individuals can have upon the interests of their “clients”.
Under section 292.1 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations a licensed attorney is entitled to represent clients before the United States Department of Homeland Security, specifically the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) which is tasked with adjudicating US visa petitions. Many are unaware of the fact that those who assist individuals in preparing visa petitions are engaging in the unauthorized practice of law if they are not: licensed to practice law in at least one US jurisdiction while being eligible to practice law in all US jurisdictions or certified by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).
Licensure is no small matter, especially for those individuals who are “represented” by those claiming to be attorneys who are not, in fact, licensed. For example, if an American talks to an unlicensed individual about sensitive matters, then such communications would not be confidential and also would not be protected under the attorney/client privilege. If one is communicating in confidence to a licensed attorney, then such communication is “out of bounds” for US Courts. However, the same communications with one who is unlicensed could be used as evidence in a US court proceeding. Therefore, licensure is extremely important particularly in US Immigration matters involving a legal ground of inadmissibility or an I-601 waiver as certain information could be very detrimental to clients’ interests and if imparted to a licensed American attorney would be confidential, but if imparted to an unlicensed “fly by night” operator such information could be used against the client at a later date.
For all of these reasons, when an American is outside of the USA it is always prudent to check the credentials of anyone claiming to be an attorney from the United States. An individual can provide adequate credentials if they can show their license to practice law before at least on State Supreme Court in the US, or a Federal license to practice law in the USA, or a license to practice law in one of the US territorial jurisdictions (Guam, Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, etc). Anyone who refuses to provide any such credentials and yet still asserts that they are an American attorney should be avoided until proof of credentials can be provided.
For further information about US Immigration from Thailand please see: K1 Visa Thailand.
11th APR 2010
US Embassy in Thailand Releases Statement About Recent Unrest
Posted by : admin
The following was posted on the website of the US Embassy in Thailand:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Office of the Spokesman
For Immediate Release
April 10, 2010
2010/418
Statement by P.J. Crowley, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Public Affairs
“The United States deeply regrets the violence on the streets of Bangkok April 10, and the loss of life. Violence is not an acceptable means of resolving political differences. We call on the United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD) and the Thai security forces to show restraint going forward. The United States firmly believes both sides can and should work out disagreements peacefully through earnest negotiation. We once again stress the importance of all players in Thailand working to resolve differences in a way that strengthens democracy and rule of law. We strongly support the Thai nation and its people during this difficult period.” [Bold and Italics added]
10th APR 2010
US Visa Denial: New Report Discusses Trends
Posted by : admin
Visa denial is generally something that most bi-national couples do not wish to discuss, but it is something that should be researched by the prospective visa petitioner as legal grounds of inadmissibility and the I-601 waiver process could be relevant to an individual couple’s Immigration petition and visa application.
In a recent report from the Congressional Research service (distributed by AILA) the issue of visa denial was discussed as the report looked at the reasons for denial and the overall trends in inadmissibility findings:
“Most LPR [Lawful Permanent Residence] petitioners who were excluded on §212(a) grounds from FY1994 through FY2004 were rejected because the Department of State (DOS) determined that the aliens were inadmissible as likely public charges. By FY2004, the proportion of public charge exclusions had fallen but remained the top basis for denial. The lack of proper labor certification was another leading ground for exclusion from FY1994 through FY2004. By FY2008, however, illegal presence and previous orders of removal from the United States was the leading ground.”
The finding of a “public charge” grounds of inadmissibility is related to the affidavit of support. A finding that an alien is likely to be a “public charge” stems from a finding that the sponsor does not have the requisite income and assets necessary to support the alien for whom benefits are being sought. The report goes further to note that Comprehensive Immigration Reform may tackle some of the issues associated with the trends in visa application denials:
“Legislation aimed at comprehensive immigration reform may take a fresh look at the grounds for excluding foreign nationals enacted over the past two decades. Expanding the grounds for inadmissibility, conversely, might be part of the legislative agenda among those who support more restrictive immigration reform policies.”
It is interesting to note that the Immigration system may become more stringent or more lax depending upon the mood of legislators with regard to the issue of immigration. That being said, a more detailed look at the current trends provides insight into the dynamics of the system as a whole:
“[M]ost LPR petitioners who were excluded on §212(a) grounds in FY1996 and FY2000 were rejected because the DOS determined that the aliens were inadmissible as likely public charges. In FY2004, the proportion of public charge exclusions had fallen, but remained the top basis for denial. The lack of proper labor certification was another leading ground for exclusion in FY1996, FY2000, FY2004, and FY2008. By FY2008, however, illegal presence and previous orders of removal from the United States had become the leading ground.”
It is interesting to note that unlawful presence and previous removal had become the leading grounds of inadmissibility cited by the year 2008. This would seem to support the anecdotal evidence and personal experience of this author as more and more prospective entrants to the US seem to be placed in expedited removal proceedings with greater frequency. Also, there seems to be an increasing trend of increasingly zealous enforcement of Immigration law in the USA as illegal aliens are placed in removal proceedings more frequently.
For further information about visa denial please see: K1 visa. For general information about US Immigration from Thailand please see: US Visa Thailand.
9th APR 2010
To see related information in English please see: 221g.
ยังคงมีข้อสงสัยเกี่ยวกับการที่วีซ่าถูกปฏิเสธภายใต้มาตรา 221 (G ) สำหรับคำร้องขอวีซ่าจากประเทศไทย การปฏิเสธวีซ่าตามมาตรา 221 (G ) ก็คือการปฏิเสธเพื่อขอหลักฐานเพิ่มเติม เมื่อเจ้าหน้าที่กงสุลตัดสินใจว่าจะออกวีซ่าสหรัฐอเมริกาให้หรือไม่ ( ในการนี้ให้ดูเรื่อง วีซ่าคู่หมั้น K1, K3 หรือ วีซ่าคู่สมรส CR1 ) เจ้าหน้าที่จะทำการสืบเสาะข้อเท็จจริงเพื่อให้มั่นใจว่าผู้ขอวีซ่าเป็นบุคคลตามที่กล่าวอ้างจริง และจะเดินทางไปสหรัฐอเมริกาด้วยเหตุผลที่มีมูล ( ในกรณีเช่นนี้หมายความว่าต้องเป็นการเดินทางไปเพื่อวัตถุประสงค์ความสัมพันธ์ทางครอบครัวกับผู้ร้องสัณชาติอเมริกัน )
คู่รักบางคู่มีความกังวลใจเมื่อได้รับ แบบ 221 (G) และก็อาจจะเป็นเรื่องที่ไม่ค่อยสะดวกเท่าไหร่โดยเฉพาะกรณีที่ผู้ขอวีซ่ามาจากต่างจังหวัด ซึ่งก็เป็นปัญหาได้ หากว่าผู้ขอวีซ่ามีสำมะโนครัว (ทะเบียนบ้าน ) อยู่ต่างจังหวัดและเป็นการยากต่อการเดินทางกลับไป บ่อยครั้งที่เอกสารที่ถูกเรียกจะต้องออกโดยอำเภอที่ผู้ขอวีซ่ามีชื่ออยู่ในทะเบียนบ้าน แม้ว่าจะเป็นเรื่องปกติสำหรับสถานทูตที่จะออก คำร้องขอเอกสารเพิ่มเติมในลักษณะนี้ แต่ก็สามารถเป็นเรื่องลำบากสำหรับผู้ขอวีซ่าชาวไทยที่จะไปนำเอกสารที่จำเป็นนั้นมาให้ได้
การปฏิเสธวีซ่าภายใต้มาตรา 221 (g) นี้โดยทั่วไปแล้วจะให้เวลาผู้ขอวีซ่า 1 ปีในการหาเอกสารที่ได้รับการร้องขอก่อนที่สถานทูตจะทำการทำลายไฟล์ของคุณ หากไม่ปฏิบัติตามคำร้องขอนี้ ก็อาจจะทำให้คำร้องขอวีซ่าของคุณถูกยกเลิกและต้องเริ่มกระบวนการใหม่อีกครั้งหนึ่ง
เพื่อหลีกเลี่ยงการปฏิเสธวีซ่าภายใต้มาตรา 221 ( G) อาจจะเป็นการดีที่จะขอความช่วยเหลือจากทนายความด้านกฎหมายคนเข้าเมือง เพื่อป้องกันการปฏิเสธวีซ่าภายใต้มาตรา 221 ( G) แต่อย่างไรก็ตาม แม้ว่าจะได้มีการจ้างทนายความแล้ว คุณก็ยังคงสามารถถูกปฏิเสธวีซ่าภายใต้มาตรา 221 ( G) ได้ หากว่ามีเอกสารอื่นที่จำเป็นต้องแสดง เจ้าหน้าที่กงสุลมีอำนาจดุลพินิจอย่างกว้างขวางตามอำนาจเด็ดขาดของกงสุล ดังนั้น คำร้องขอเอกสารเพิ่มเติมโดยเจ้าหน้ากงสุลเป็นเรื่องที่คุณต้องให้การตอบรับคำร้องขอนั้นภายในเวลาที่กำหนดให้
The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisement. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience. The information presented on this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

Thailand Call: 02-266 3698
USA Call: 1-(316)-974-0454
