
Integrity Legal
- Legal Blog
- Integrity Legal Home
- Thai Visa
- Company in Thailand
- Real Estate Thailand
- US Visa
- Contact Us
Archive for the ‘K-3 Visa Thailand’ Category
30th June 2010
USCIS Issues Notice Regarding Unused Family Based Visas
Posted by : admin
This blog primarily reports upon issues revolving around US Family Visas. With that in mind the following announcement was made in a press release from the United States Department of Homeland Security’s Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) Ombudsman, this quote is provided by the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA):
During FY 2009 and FY 2010, usage of family-based visas has been exceptionally low, especially among spouses and children of green card holders (the F-2A preference category). In FY 2009, approximately 10,000 family-based visas were unused and, by statute, were reallocated for use by employment-based immigrants in FY 2010.
It is interesting to note the relative lack of interest in Family based visas under preference category F-2A because, in this author’s experience, there is little decline in the demand for spouse and family based visas for the immediate relatives of American Citizens. That said, there seems to have been a slight decrease in demand for the K1 visa in Thailand, but this is likely attributable to the recent unrest in the city of Bangkok.
For those readers who are unaware, United States Citizens may petition for their foreign fiancee to travel to the USA on a K1 Fiance Visa. After arrival the fiancee must marry the American petitioner within 90 days of entry and subsequently file an application for adjustment of status. Those American Citizens with a spouse overseas may petition for a US Marriage Visa. There are multiple marriage visa categories although the once popular K3 Visa is no longer being processed by the National Visa Center where the underlying visa petition arrives contemporaneously or before the K3 visa application.
For those who are not United States Citizens, a K1 visa is not available for the fiancees of Lawful Permanent Residents. Furthermore, the spouse of a Lawful Permanent Resident is not given high priority compared to the spouse of a US Citizen. This preference has existed for a relatively long period of time. There are those who argue for “rolling over” the balance of preference petitions in order to provide a chance for later applicants to enjoy the higher relative priority. That being said, current Immigration policy favors employment petitions if there is are any unused visa numbers in the aforementioned family based category.
Some speculate that Comprehensive Immigration Reform will have a dramatic impact upon the overall Immigration system, but for now the current system remains and those seeking a family based visa in the F-2a category would be wise to file sooner rather than later.
18th June 2010
Frequently this author uses this blog to post accurate processing time estimates for the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) Centers in the United States. USCIS is a key agency tasked with adjudicating Immigration petitions prior to possible Consular adjudication at a US Embassy or US Consulate abroad.
The following was quoted from the USCIS website on June 18, 2010. These are the current processing time estimates for the USCIS service center in California:
I-129F | Petition for Alien Fiance(e) | K-1/K-2 – Not yet married – fiance and/or dependent child | 5 Months |
---|---|---|---|
I-129F | Petition for Alien Fiance(e) | K-3/K-4 – Already married – spouse and/or dependent child | 5 Months |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a spouse, parent, or child under 21 | 5 Months |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for an unmarried son or daughter over 21 | November 09, 2005 |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a married son or daughter over 21 | June 23, 2002 |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a brother or sister | September 02, 2001 |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | Permanent resident filling for a spouse or child under 21 | January 02, 2009 |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | Permanent resident filling for an unmarried son or daughter over 21 | November 16, 2003 |
I-131 | Application for Travel Document | All other applicants for advance parole | 3 Months |
I-129 | Petition for A Nonimmigrant Worker | E – Treaty traders and investors | 2 Months |
---|---|---|---|
I-129 | Petition for A Nonimmigrant Worker | L – Intracompany transfers | 1 Months |
The following are estimated processing times for the USCIS Service Center in Vermont:
I-129F | Petition for Alien Fiance(e) | K-1/K-2 – Not yet married – fiance and/or dependent child | 5 Months |
---|---|---|---|
I-129F | Petition for Alien Fiance(e) | K-3/K-4 – Already married – spouse and/or dependent child | 5 Months |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a spouse, parent, or child under 21 | 5 Months |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for an unmarried son or daughter over 21 | July 22, 2009 |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a married son or daughter over 21 | July 13, 2009 |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | U.S. citizen filing for a brother or sister | 5 Months |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | Permanent resident filling for a spouse or child under 21 | December 03, 2008 |
I-130 | Petition for Alien Relative | Permanent resident filling for an unmarried son or daughter over 21 | August 03, 2009 |
I-131 | Application for Travel Document | Permanent resident applying for a re-entry permit | 3 Months |
I-131 | Application for Travel Document | Refugee or asylee applying for a refugee travel document | 3 Months |
I-129 | Petition for A Nonimmigrant Worker | E – Treaty traders and investors | 2 Months |
---|---|---|---|
I-129 | Petition for A Nonimmigrant Worker | L – Intracompany transfers | 1 Months |
I-129 | Petition for A Nonimmigrant Worker | Blanket L | 2 Months |
Those interested in bringing a foreign loved one to the United States on a K1 visa, K3 Visa, CR1 visa, or IR visa are advised to remember that the above processing time estimates do not take into account special circumstances, Consular Processing, I-601 waiver adjudication, or I-212 waiver adjudication. Therefore, those interested in obtaining a US visa are wise to consult a US Immigration lawyer prior to making any decisions as different visa categories can process faster relative to other categories.
Due to recent unrest in the Kingdom of Thailand, those processing through that Consular Post may find that it takes a bit longer to get an appointment compared to more tranquil periods. However, it should be noted that the US Embassy in Thailand has diligently worked to clear the backlog caused by the recent Embassy closure and processing is getting back to a state of relative normality.
For further information please see: US Visa Thailand.
13th June 2010
K Visas vs. Immigrant Visas: Increased Fees May Lead to New Strategies
Posted by : admin
With the recently announced fee increases associated with K visa applications filed overseas, there are many who feel that serious thought should be given to the type of visa a couple should petition to obtain. In the past, many couples who were thinking of marriage opted to apply for a US fiance visa, also referred to as a K1 visa. That being said, it was recently announced that the application fee for all K visas sought overseas would be increased from $131 to $350. Apparently, the resources accrued are to be used in furtherance of fraud prevention measures as well as implementation of measures meant to streamline the overall visa process. As the fee increase was only recently announced, it remains to be seen how newly acquired fees will be used on the Consular level. With that in mind, it has also been recently announced that USCIS may be raising fees for Immigrant visa petitions. For those who are unfamiliar with this blog, it should be noted that for purposes of traveling to the USA, the K1 visa and the K3 Visa are considered to be immigrant visas even though they do not automatically confer lawful permanent residence to the bearer upon entry in the USA.
Those seeking a US visa would be prudent to seriously consider their options because the costs associated with the process of applying for and obtaining a CR1 visa or an IR1 visa may be lower in some cases when compared to the costs associated with the K1 visa process. When viewed from a long term perspective the CR1 visa, although more time consuming to obtain, confers lawful permanent residence to the bearer upon entry and thereby negates the necessity of adjustment of status which is necessary for those who travel to the US on a K1 visa with the intent to marry the Petitioner and remain in the USA permanently.
In most cases, those wishing to bring a spouse to the USA are wise to bear in mind the fact that K3 visa applications, once a popular travel document for bi-national married couples, are now being administratively closed by the National Visa Center if the underlying I-130 is approved prior to, or at the same time as, the I-129f application. This has lead to many instances of spouses being required by circumstance to process a CR1 or IR1 visa rather than a K3 visa because the NVC simply will not process the K3 application.
For those interested in further information about US Immigration please see: American Visa Thailand.
12th June 2010
In a recent transcript from a news conference held by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) it was announced that USCIS may be increasing many of the fees associated with US Immigration petitions. The following is a direct quote from the aforementioned news conference transcript:
While we received appropriations from Congress, budget cuts of approximately $160 million have not bridged the remaining gap between costs and anticipated revenue. A fee adjustment, as detailed in the proposed rule, is therefore necessary to address that gap.
Although few seem to doubt the fact that USCIS has experienced a revenue shortfall, many seem to be perturbed by the announcement of fee increases. The following is quoted from the AILA Leadership blog:
Yesterday, due to lower than projected fee revenues, USCIS proposed a fee increase that will amount to an average increase of 10% across the board. USCIS will issue the formal proposal on Friday and there will be a 45 day comment period. This, in combination with the 66% fee increase that was implemented in 2007, constitutes a tremendous hit in the pocketbook for a variety of users of immigration services. For example, an I-130 petition for an alien relative will jump from $355 to $420, under this proposal, thus impacting those who want to be reunited with family members. An I-131 application for a travel document goes up by $55, and an application for an employment authorization document increases by $40. Adjustment of status fees will increase by $55. Businesses will also bear some of the brunt, with I-140 petitions for immigrant workers increasing over $100, premium processing going up by $225 and a brand new fee of $6,230 to establish a Regional Center under the EB-5 program. And –perhaps the coup de grace—fees for filing I-290 Notices of Appeal will increase from $585 to $630, a $45 dollar increase that will allow us to continue to file appeals that take over 2 years to adjudicate and generally conclude with either a rubber stamping of the original decision, or as in a handful of recent AAO decisions, a tortured legal analysis resulting in increasingly restrictive interpretations of the law.
The tone of the above quote leaves some readers feeling as though the author is rather upset about the recently proposed fee increase. The following passages from the aforementioned post on the AILA Leadership blog leaves little to the imagination regarding some practitioners feelings with regard to the proposed fee increases:
Why do these fee increases feel like a punch in the stomach to immigration practitioners? Because they come at a time when the quality of decision-making and the ability to correct even the simplest errors or address basic problems with USCIS are at an all-time low. A small sampling of the problems we have all experienced with alarming increased frequency over the past few years…Application of new extra-regulatory standards in case adjudication…Adjudication of issues not within the province of USCIS…A “pick and choose” attitude with respect to previously issued long-standing agency guidance…Lack of accessibility of agency officials and decision-makers…Lack of predictability in decision-making…Lack of respect for the role of counsel in various proceedings: Examples: Practitioners report that they are sometimes not copied on RFE’s, and that district offices from time to time have barred attorneys from accompanying their clients to adjustment interviews.
Although USCIS adjudicates cases on an individual basis and no single practitioner can make a generalized statement about USCIS adjudication generally, there appears to be an increasingly common feeling among immigration practitioners that agencies associated with Immigration adjudication are becoming rather unpredictable.
Also of possible interest to those seeking certain family based visas such as the K1 visa and the K3 Visa is the fact that the US Department of State has recently raised the fees associated with such applications when adjudicated by US Consulates abroad. The previous fee for K visa applications was $131, but under the newly promulgated rules the K visa application fee has been raised to $350. Those seeking K3 visas are unlikely to be adversely impacted by the recent fee increase as K3 visa applications are currently being “administratively closed,” in many cases, by the National Visa Center. That said, those seeking a K1 Fiance Visa will likely be required to pay the increased fee in order to have their K1 visa application adjudicated.
27th May 2010
USCIS Issues New Employment Authorization Document (EAD)
Posted by : admin
For those who bring a foreign fiance or fiancee to the United States of America, an often asked question is: “What if my fiancee wants to work in the USA prior to her adjustment of status?” The answer to this question is somewhat complicated. When a foreign fiancee or spouse enters the United States on a non-immigrant K1 visa or K3 Visa, the entrant is generally not authorized to take up employment in the USA until that alien either adjusts status to permanent residence (Green Card) or obtains employment authorization. Recently, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) announced that, in an effort to decrease immigration fraud, new Employment Authorization Documents are to be issued. The following is a direct quote from USCIS’s official statement:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) today announced that it has revised the Employment Authorization Document (EAD), or Form I-766, to incorporate the addition of a machine-readable zone on the back of the card.. This update to the EAD is part of USCIS’s ongoing efforts to deter immigration fraud. Starting May 11, USCIS began issuing the revised EAD cards. The machine-readable zone is compliant with International Civil Aviation Organization standards. USCIS also removed the two-dimensional bar code on the backside of the card and moved the informational box of text to just beneath the magnetic stripe on the card. The revised card retains all of its existing security features.
In most cases, foreign fiancees or spouses of US Citizens opt to wait for permanent residence before taking up employment. However, in some instances this is not the case as there are increasing numbers of foreign fiancees and spouses who work for multi-national companies. These international businesses sometimes wish to have their non-US Citizen employee start work in the USA as soon as they can. Therefore, there are situations in which speedy employment authorization is a necessity.
In the past, K3 Visa holders could seek employment authorization at the port of entry when they entered the USA. As the K-3 Visa is being increasingly phased out, this method of receiving employment authorization is being employed less frequently. Another issue that often arises in the context of Employment Authorization is that of advance parole. Holders of a US fiance visa cannot leave the United States prior to adjustment of status and simultaneously maintain their lawful K1 status unless they apply for, and receive, an advance parole travel document. In some cases, couples making an application for advance parole will also make an application for an EAD in order to work in the USA.
26th May 2010
Consular Processing Fees to Increase on June 4, 2010
Posted by : admin
In recent postings on this blog, this author has discussed proposed fee increases for Consular services at US Embassies and Consulates outside of the United States of America. Recently the American State Department made the following announcement:
The Department is increasing fees to ensure sufficient resources to cover the rising cost of processing nonimmigrant visas. This increase applies both to nonimmigrant visas placed in passports and to border crossing cards issued to certain applicants in Mexico. The new, tiered fee structure was created to cover the higher unit costs for processing certain categories of nonimmigrant visas that are more complicated and require more in-depth consideration than most other categories of nonimmigrant visas. The Department is required to recover, as far as possible, the cost of processing nonimmigrant visas through the collection of the application fees. For a number of reasons, including new security enhancements, the $131 fee set on January 1, 2008 no longer covers the current, actual cost of processing nonimmigrant visas. Under the new schedule of fees, applicants for all visas that are not petition-based, including B1/B2 tourist and business visitor visas and all student and exchange visitor (F, M and J) visas, will pay a fee of $140. Applicants for petition-based visas will pay an application fee of $150. These categories include:
· H visa for temporary workers and trainees
· L visa for intracompany transferees
· O visa for aliens with extraordinary ability
· P visa for athletes, artists and entertainers
· Q visa for international cultural exchange visitors
· R visa for religious occupations
The application fee for K visas for fiancé(e)s of U.S. citizens will be $350. The fee for E visas for treaty-traders and treaty investors will be $390.
The last portion of this announcement is of the most pressing concern to those wishing to bring a Thai loved one to the USA. Many Americans opt to use a K1 visa to bring a Thai fiancee to the United States. In the past, many also utilized the K3 Visa to bring Thai spouses to the USA. At the time of this writing the National Visa Center (under the authority of the Department of State) is administratively closing all I-129f petitions for K3 Visas if the underlying I-130 petition has been submitted to the NVC concurrently with, or prior to, the submission of the I-129f petition. Therefore, the increase in fees is unlikely to have a major impact upon those seeking a US marriage visa as the vast majority of US Marriage visas being processed out of any US Consulate or US Embassy are immigrant visas (CR1 or IR1) rather than non-immigrant K3 visas.
For further general information about US Immigration from Thailand please see: Fiance Visa Thailand.
22nd May 2010
Visa Unit at US Embassy in Bangkok to Remain Closed Monday May 24th
Posted by : admin
Please be advised that the following was posted upon the official website of the United States Embassy in Bangkok, Thailand:
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT
U.S. Embassy Visa Services Closed May 24, 2010
Due to continuing security concerns in the area and access issues on Wireless Road, the U.S. Embassy is currently operating under emergency personnel staffing only. The Non-immigrant and Immigrant Visa sections will be closed May 24, 2010. If you have a non-immigrant visa interview appointment scheduled for May 24, 2010, your appointment will be rescheduled. As soon as the U.S. Embassy has determined the situation to be safe for Embassy Consular staff to return to work and for visa applicants to travel to the Embassy for visa appointments, we will advise those impacted through e-mail or phone with details on new appointment dates. Please Note: As a large number of people have been affected by these events, and the volume of appointments that have been scheduled for the upcoming weeks, it will not be possible to consider expedited appointments. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this has caused.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can I reschedule my appointment?
At present, we must ask applicants with visa appointments scheduled for the period of May 14 through May 24 to wait until the Embassy has determined when that it is safe to conduct visa appointments. All those impacted by this unexpected closure will be notified through the e-mail address or phone number provided during the visa interview appointment process.
I had a visa appointment scheduled during the period of May 14 – May 24. I have urgent travel to the United States, what can I do?
Unfortunately, due to the current security situation, the U.S. Embassy Visa Services is currently closed. We are unable to reschedule any visa appointments for applicants who had appointments made for the period of May 14 – May 24 and will be unable to accommodate expedited appointments. We suggest that you make alternate travel plans.
I had a visa appointment scheduled during the period of May 14 – May 24. Can I reschedule my appointment at another U.S. Embassy in a neighboring country?
Each U.S. Embassy has its own scheduling system and requirements for visa applicants. Fees paid in Thailand for the visa interview cannot be used abroad.
I had a visa appointment scheduled during the period of May 14 – May 24. Can I reschedule my appointment for the U.S. Consulate General in Chiang Mai?
The U.S. Consulate General in Chiang Mai has its own appointment system and you must live within their consular district to schedule an appointment there. Please see http://chiangmai.usconsulate.gov/ for more information.
I had a visa appointment scheduled during the period of May 14 – May 24. Can I make a special request?
Due to the current security situation, the U.S. Embassy Visa Services will be closed for the period of May 14 – May 24. As such, we will be unable to reply to visa inquiries and/or special requests during that period. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience our disruption of service has caused.
I am an immigrant visa applicant – can I come in for my scheduled appointment, to drop off documents, or to pick up my visa?
If you had/have an immigrant visa appointment for the period of May 14 – May 24, it will be rescheduled. You will be contacted with a new date and time once the Embassy reopens. If you have been told to bring in documents on Mondays or Wednesdays, or to come in to pick up your visa, please do not come in until the Embassy reopens. Please look for announcements on the Embassy website.
The documentation mentioned above is likely referencing 221g refusals or requests for other types of documentation related to the issuance of travel documents such as, but not limited to, the K1 visa, the K3 Visa, or Immigrant visas such as the CR1 Visa and the IR1 Visa.
For further information about American attorney assistance in Immigration matters as well as Consular Processing in Bangkok, Thailand please see: US Embassy Bangkok and/or US Embassy Thailand.
11th May 2010
แบบคำขออภัยโทษ I-601 และการปฏิเสธวีซ่า : พัฒนาการใหม่ปี 2010
Posted by : admin
ในเคสที่วีซ่าถูกปฏิเสธ ก็อาจจะหาทางแก้โดยการยื่นขออภัยโทษได้หากว่าการปฏิเสธเกิดจากการมีเหตุที่ทำให้ไม่สามารถเข้าเมืองได้ การขออภัยโทษแบบนี้ เราเรียกว่า I-601 ครั้งหนึ่งหากว่าผู้ขอวีซ่ามีเชื้อ HIV ก็จะถูกปฏิเสธวีซ่าด้วยเหตุนี้เหตุเดียวหากว่าไม่มีเหตุอื่นที่พบอีก อย่างไรก็ตามเร็มๆนี้หน่วยงานคนเข้าเมืองสหรัฐได้เปลี่ยนกฏใหม่ ตามประกาศของ สมาคมนักกฎหมายคนเข้าเมืองอเมริกัน (AILA) :
“ การติดเชื้อ HIV ไม่ใช่เหตุที่ทำให้ไม่สามารถเข้าเมืองได้อีกต่อไป หากคุณติดเชื้อ HIV ก็ไม่จำเป็นต้องยื่นขออภัยโทษ I-601 เพราะเหตุที่คุณป่วยด้วยเชื้อ HIV อีกต่อไป จากข้อสังเกตุ ในแบบ I-601 มีการลบวิธีการดำเนินการและข้อความใดๆเกี่ยวกับการติดเชื้อ HIV ออกไปแล้ว”
นี่ไม่ใช้กฎข้อเดียวที่มีการเปลี่ยนแปลง เนื่องจากวิธีการยื่นขออภัยโทษเองก็เปลี่ยนแปลงไปด้วยเพื่อให้มีความแม่นยำในเรื่องของภูมิลำเนาที่ยื่นเช่นเดียวกับการปรับเปลี่ยนกฎเกณฑ์อื่นๆ
“นอกจากนี้ USCIS ได้ประกาศว่ามีการปรับเปลี่ยนวิธีการยื่น และที่อยู่ที่จะต้องยื่นแบบ I-601 การเปลี่ยนสถานที่ยื่นแบบเป็นส่วนหนึ่งของความพยายามที่จะทำให้เกิดประโยชน์ของสำนักงาน USCIS ท้องถิ่นและ หน่วยรับเรื่องของ USCIS โดยรวมที่ยื่นแบบและจ่ายค่าธรรมเนียมให้อยู่ที่ หน่วยรับเรื่องหน่วยเดียวเพื่อให้ USCIS สามารถให้บริการประชาชนได้อย่างมีประสิทธิภาพในเรื่องของแบบคำร้องและค่าธรรมเนียม ”
วิธีการใช้ศูนย์รับเรื่องนี้ใช้กับกรณียื่นวีซ่าถาวร เช่น IR1 และ CR1 ซึ่งเปิดโอกาศให้ USCIS เตรียมระบบการจัดการกับคำขอวีซ่าได้เนื่องจากมันถูกส่งไปที่สถานที่ๆเดียว อย่างไรก็ดี วีซ่า K1 และ K3 จะต้องยื่นแก่ ศูนย์ USCIS ที่มีเขตอำนาจเท่านั้น
ในกรณีที่ แบบ I-601 นั้นยื่นในต่างประเทศ คำร้องมักถูกยื่นผ่าน สถานทูตหรือกงสุลสหรัฐอเมริกาที่วีซ่าถูกปฏิเสธ ซึ่งนี่เปิดโอกาสให้เจ้าหน้าที่กงสุลทำความเห็นเกี่ยวกับคำร้องได้ ผู้ที่สนใจจะยื่นคำร้องขออภัยโทษโปรดจำไว้ว่าทนายความสหรัฐอเมริกาที่มีใบอนุญาติ หรือตัวแทนที่มีใบอนุญาติเท่านั้นที่สถานทูตสหรัฐและ USCIS ยอมให้เป็นตัวแทนของเจ้าของเรื่องในการติดต่อได้ นั่นหมายความว่า จะต้องเป็นทนายเท่านั้นจึงจะสามารถเรียกค่าธรรมเนียมเพื่อการยื่นคำร้องนี้ได้ และหน่วยงานที่เป็นตัวแทนที่ได้รับอนุญาติส่วนใหญ่ที่กระทำการแทนได้ก็มักเป็นหน่วยงานไม่หวังผลประโยชน์ที่เพียงเก็บค่าการเป็นตัวแทน ( ถ้าหากว่าจะมีการเรียกเก็บ ) เมื่อให้ความช่วยเหลือแก่ผู้อพยพ บุคคลที่ไม่มีใบอนุญาติให้เป็นตัวแทนลูกความในกระบวนการคนเข้าเมืองไม่สามารถเรียกค่าธรรมเนียมเพื่อเป็นตัวแทนได้ตามกฎหมายสหรัฐอเมริกา สำหรับข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม คลิกที่นี่
6th May 2010
Puerto Rico To Begin Issuing New Birth Certificates
Posted by : admin
Few people realize that Puerto Rico is, for immigration purposes, part of the United States of America. This legal posture is enshrined in the United States Immigration and Nationality Act. In a recent posting on the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration Website it was announced that the Puerto Rican authorities will be making sweeping changes to the rules effecting the issuance of birth certificates:
The government of Puerto Rico has enacted a new law (Law 191 of 2009) aimed at strengthening the issuance and usage of birth certificates to combat fraud and protect the identity and credit of all people born in Puerto Rico.
The new law was based on collaboration with the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to address the fraudulent use of Puerto Rico-issued birth certificates to unlawfully obtain U.S. passports, Social Security benefits, and other federal services.
Under the new law, all Puerto Rico birth certificates issued before July 1, 2010, will be invalidated so that new, more secure certificates can be issued. Until that date, all birth certificates will remain valid.
It is important to understand that there is no need to rush out and get a new birth certificate on July 1. It is suggested that only people who have a specific need for their birth certificate for official purposes need request a new birth certificate right away.
As many may be aware, birth certificates are an integral component of many visa petition packages. This is particularly true for K1 visa petitions, K3 Visa petitions, IR1 and CR1 visa petitions. How these proposed chages will impact immigration to the United States from abroad, and from Puerto Rico, remains to be seen, but it is clear that government officials are taking the issue of fraud prevention seriously.
Birth certificates are such an important piece of documentation that some believe that it is clearly self evident that maintaining the integrity of such documents is vitally important in maintaining security in the United States of America. In the 50 United States, there have been innumerable programs that are intended to make it more difficult for individuals to obtain fraudulent documentation. It would appear that this overall policy is being extended to US territorial possessions in order to provide increased document security in the outlying jurisdictions of the United States of America.
For more information about births overseas and obtaining birth registration documentation from abroad please see: Consular Report of Birth Abroad. For information about registering Thai births overseas please see: Thai Consular Report of Birth Abroad.
6th May 2010
ในกระทู้ก่อนๆ เราได้อธิบายถึงขั้นตอนการขอวีซ่า เค ทรี การยื่นขอวีซ่าเค ทรี ในปัจจุบันกระบวนการขอวีซ่าเค ทรี กลายเป็นเรื่องที่เอาแน่เอานอนไม่ได้ เนื่องจาก NVC จะไม่เดินเรื่อง I129F สำหรับวีซ่า เค ทรี หากว่าคำขอ I 130 นั้นมาถึง NVC ก่อน หรือ พร้อมๆกับคำขอ I 129 F ต้องให้เครดิตกับ USCIS ที่ดำเนินการคำขอ I 129F และ I 130 รวดเร็วพอๆกัน อย่างไรก็ตามสำหรับคนที่ต้องการวีซ่าคู่สมรสแบบด่วน การพยายามของคุณอาจนำไปสู่สถานการณ์ที่คุณไม่อยากให้เกิดขึ้น
NVC ได้เคยบอกไว้ว่าจะหยุดดำเนินการคำขอ I 129F ในกรณีที่กล่าวไว้ด้านบน ซึ่งกรณีเช่นว่านี้ทำให้บุคคลที่แต่งงานกันภายใต้เขตอำนาจรัฐใดๆเพื่อขอวีซ่าคู่สมรสในเขตอำนาจสถานทูตในรัฐนั้นๆเป็นไปได้ยากขึ้น ภายใต้กฎเกณฑ์ที่ทำให้เกิดวีซ่า เค ทรี จะต้องดำเนินการขอวีซ่าในสถานทูตในเขตที่ที่คู่สมรสนั้นได้สมรสกัน ซึ่งเรื่องนี้ทำให้คู่สมรสหลายๆคู่สามารถ เลือกเขตอำนาจว่าจะขอวีซ่าผ่านทางประเทศใด ตัวอย่างเช่น ถ้าคู่สมรสอยากจะขอวีซ่าผ่านสถานทูตในอิตาลี ก็สามารถทำการสมรสในอิตาลีเพื่อให้มั่นใจได้ว่าเรื่องจะถูกดำเนินการที่อิตาลีแน่นอน
ในขณะนี้เป็นเพราะว่าอนาคตของวีซ่าเค ทรี ยังไม่แน่นอน ก็มีความเป็นไปได้ว่าการเลือกเขตอำนาจสถานทูตจะเป็นอดีตไป หมายความว่า วีซ่าถาวรเช่น CR1 และ IR1 อาจจะถูกส่งไปที่สถานทูตที่คู่สมรสต่างด้าวมีสัญชาติและสถานทูตและกงสุลมักจะดำเนินการคำขอของผู้มีสัญชาติที่ไม่ใช่ของประเทศตนโดยมารยาท และหากว่าไม่สะดวกก็จะส่งเรื่องไปยังสถานทูตที่ต้องเป็นผู้ดำเนินการ
หวังว่าการเปลี่ยนแปลงในครั้งนี้จะไม่เป็นปัญหาใดๆ นั่นหมายความว่า ตราบใดที่ USCIS ยังเดินเรื่อง I-130 ได้เร็ว ก็ดูเหมือนว่า NVC จะปิดเรื่อง เค ทรี และทำให้เป็นการป้องกันไม่ให้เกิดการเลือกเขตอำนาจสถานทูต สำหรับคู่หมั้นต่างด้าวในประเทศ เช่น พม่า กัมพูชา การเปลี่ยนแปลงนี้อาจทำให้เกิดความยากลำบากเนื่องจากประเทศทั้งสองมีระบบราชการที่ทำให้เกิดความยุ่งยากมากๆกับสตรีสัญชาติของตนที่แต่งงานกับชายอเมริกัน
สำหรับข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมว่านโยบายของ NVC จะส่งผลต่อการขอวีซ่าคู่หมั้นอย่างไร โปรดดู K1 visa
The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisement. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience. The information presented on this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.