Thailand Call: 02-266 3698
USA Call: 1-(316)-974-0454
Integrity Legal
- Legal Blog
- Integrity Legal Home
- Thai Visa
- Company in Thailand
- Real Estate Thailand
- US Visa
- Contact Us
Posts Tagged ‘US Marriage Visa Cambodia’
7th December 2017
ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ពីប្រទេសកម្ពុជា
Posted by : admin
Khmer language translation of the video found here: ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ពីប្រទេសកម្ពុជា
សួស្ដី! ខ្ញុំឈ្មោះ Benjamin Hart ។ ខ្ញុំគឺជាមេធាវី និងជានាយកគ្រប់គ្រងនៃក្រុមហ៊ុនIntegrity Legal នៅក្នុងទីក្រុងបាងកកនៃប្រទេសថៃ ។
នៅក្នុងវីដេអូថ្ងៃនេះ យើងនឹងពិភាក្សាជាពិសេសអំពីទិដ្ឋាការមួយគឺ ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ដែលជាប្រភេទទិដ្ឋាការដ៏គួរអោយចាប់អារម្មណ៍មួយ ដោយផ្តោតទៅលើបរិបទប្រទេសកម្ពុជា សំរាប់ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរដែលចង់ដាក់ពាក្យរៀបអាពាហ៍ពិពាហ៍ជាមួយប្រជាពលរដ្ឋអាមរិក ។ និយាយអោយចំទៅ គឺអ្នកដែលត្រូវរៀបអាពាហ៍ពិពាហ៍ជាមួយប្រជាពលរដ្ឋអាមេរិក ដើម្បីដាក់ពាក្យសុំទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ។
ដូចដែលយើងបានលើកឡើងខាងលើ យើងស្ថិតនៅក្នុងទីក្រុងបាងកក ។ យើងបានរត់ការសំណុំរឿងរបស់ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋថៃជាច្រើន ហើយដោយសារតែយើងក៏ស្ថិតនៅជិតប្រទេសកម្ពុជា ដែរនោះ ជាច្រើនឆ្នាំកន្លងមកនេះយើងក៏បានរត់ការអោយសំណុំរឿងជាច្រើនរបស់ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរ ឬសំណុំរឿងផ្សេងៗទៀតដែលមានពាក់ព័ន្ធនឹងជនជាតិខ្មែរ ។ ដូច្នេះយើងចង់បញ្ជាក់ថា ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 នេះជាទិដ្ឋាការមួយដ៏គួរអោយចាប់អារម្មណ៍ ។
យើងសូមពន្យល់រៀបរាប់បន្តិចថាតើអ្វីជាទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ។ ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ត្រូវបានបង្កើតឡើងដោយយោងតាមប្រការមួយចំនួននៅក្នុងច្បាប់អាយុជីវិត ដែលត្រូវបានបង្កើតឡើងនៅក្នុងអណត្តិរបស់ប្រធានាធិបតី Clinton នៅពេលដែលមានសំណុំរឿងជាច្រើនដែលបានកកស្ទះ ពាក់ព័ន្ធនឹងប្រភេទទិដ្ឋាការប្ដីប្រពន្ធ គឺ CR-1 និង IR-1 ហើយនៅក្នុងទំព័ររបស់យើងនេះ ក៏មានវីដេអូមួយទៀតដែរ ដែលនិយាយផ្ដោតជាពិសេសទៅលើប្រភេទទិដ្ឋាការ CR-1 និង IR-1 នេះនៅក្នុងប្រទេសកម្ពុជា ។ នៅពេលនោះ ជាធម្មតាវាទាមទាររយៈពេលជាច្រើនឆ្នាំដើម្បីបញ្ចប់សំណុំរឿងមួយ ។ ក្រសួងមាតុភូមិ ធ្វើការសំរេចលើពាក្យធានាសំរាប់ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទរៀបអាពាហ៍ពិពាហ៍ ។ ក្នុងពេលជាមួយគ្នានោះដែរ វាទាមទារពេលប្រហែល ៦, ៧ ឬ៨ខែ ដើម្បីទទួលបានការសំរេចយល់ព្រមលើសំណុំបែបបទធានាសុំទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទគូដណ្ដឹង ។ ដូច្នេះជាចុងក្រោយ អ្វីដែលគេជួបច្រើន គឺស្ថានភាពដែលសំណុំរឿងគូដណ្ដឹងត្រូវបានដំណើរការលឿនជាងប្ដីប្រពន្ធ ហើយយើងសូមបញ្ជាក់ផងដែរថាតាមផ្លូវច្បាប់ ជាពិសេសច្បាប់អន្តោប្រវេសន៍ មិនមានភាពខុសគ្នានោះទេរវាងប្ដីប្រពន្ធ និងគូដណ្ដឹង ដោយតាមផ្លូវច្បាប់សំណុំរឿងទាំងពីរនេះត្រូវបានចាត់ទុកថាដូចគ្នា ។ បើគិតតាមផ្លូវរដ្ឋបាលវិញ មានការកកស្ទះសំណុំរឿងទិដ្ឋាការ ឬសំណុំពាក្យធានាប្រភេទរៀបអាពាហ៍ពិពាហ៍ជាច្រើន ។ ខ្ញុំមិនដឹងថាវាមកពីហេតុអ្វីដែរនោះទេ ប្រហែលជាអាចបណ្ដាលមកពីពួកគេដំណើរការទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-1បានយ៉ាងមានប្រសិទ្ធិភាពជាង ឬមកពីមានសំណុំរឿងទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-1មានចំនួនតិច ប៉ុន្តែនៅពេលនោះវាទាមទារពេលជាច្រើនឆ្នាំដើម្បីទទួលបានការដំណើរការពាក្យសុំធានាសំរាប់ការរៀបការជាមួយពលរដ្ឋអាមេរិក ដោយក្នុងខណៈពេលជាមួយគ្នានោះ វាទាមទារពេលត្រឹមតែប៉ុន្មានខែប៉ុណ្ណោះសំរាប់សំណុំរឿងគូដណ្ដឹង ។ ដូច្នេះហើយ ទើបពួកគេបានបង្កើតទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ដោយនិយាយថា «ប្រសិនបើអ្នកបានដាក់ពាក្យធានាប្ដីឬប្រពន្ធរបស់អ្នកតាមប្រភេទទិដ្ឋាការ CR-1 ឬ IR-1ជាធម្មតាហើយ អ្នកអាចដាក់ពាក្យមួយទៀត ដោយសុំទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 វិញ» ។ អ្នកគ្រាន់តែដាក់ពាក្យម្តងទៀតតាមទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K ។ នោះហើយគឺជាអ្វីដែលពួកគេបានធ្វើ ។ ពួកគេគ្រាន់តែទាញយកសំណុំរឿងទិដ្ឋាការរៀបការទាំងនេះហើយនិយាយថា អូខេ សំណុំរឿងនេះត្រូវបានដាក់ពាក្យហើយ អ្នកត្រូវបញ្ជាក់ថាពាក្យធានារបស់អ្នកត្រូវបានដាក់តាមដំណើរការដូចដែលគេធ្វើសំរាប់គូដណ្ដឹង ។ ជាលទ្ធផល K-3 គឺជាពាក្យដែលត្រូវបានគេប្រើសំរាប់ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទរៀបការជាមួយពលរដ្ឋអាមេរិក ប៉ុន្តែតាមពិត វិធីតាមទំលាប់ដែលគេត្រូវធ្វើដើម្បីនាំអ្នកណាម្នាក់មកកាន់សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិកគឺតាមរយៈទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ CR-1 ឬ IR-1 ។ ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ត្រូវបានគេប្រើជាទូទៅនៅក្នុងសំណុំរឿងនេះ ពីព្រោះមនុស្សទូទៅស៊ាំនឹងការរត់ការប្រភេទ K-3 ដោយសារតែវាគឺជាវិធីដ៏មានប្រសិទ្ធភាពក្នុងការនាំយកប្ដីឬប្រពន្ធមកកាន់សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក ។ វាជារឿងមួយដ៏គួរអោយចាប់អារម្មណ៍ដែរ ដោយសារតែ ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 នៅតែតំរូវអោយមានការផ្លាស់ប្តូរស្ថានភាពអន្តោប្រវេសន៍របស់អ្នកទៅជាអ្នករស់នៅជាអចិន្ត្រៃយ៍ដោយស្របច្បាប់ ។ សំរាប់អ្នកដែលចង់ដឹងអំពីដំណើរការក្នុងការផ្លាស់ប្ដូរស្ថានភាពអន្តោប្រវេសន៍ សូមចូលទៅមើលវីដេអូនៅក្នុងទំព័រនេះផងដែរដែលពិភាក្សាជាពិសេសអំពីដំណើរការនៃការផ្លាស់ប្ដូរនេះ ប៉ុន្តែអ្វីដែលយើងនឹងពិភាក្សានៅថ្ងៃនេះគឺ ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ។ ទោះបីជាទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទនេះអាចនឹងមានប្រយោជន៍នៅក្នុងលក្ខខណ្ឌសព្វថ្ងៃនេះ ក៏ប៉ុន្តែកាលពីមុនគឺមានបទបញ្ជារដ្ឋបាល ដែលជាគោលនយោបាយបិទតាមបែបរដ្ឋបាល ដែលត្រូវបានអនុវត្តដោយមជ្ឈមណ្ឌលទិដ្ឋាការជាតិ ដែលជាធម្មតានិយាយថា «ឥឡូវមើល ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ត្រូវបានបង្កើតឡើងសំរាប់ស្ថានភាពដែលទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទរៀបការឬទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទអន្តោប្រវេសន៍ ត្រូវបានបាត់នៅក្នុងគំនរឯកសារកកស្ទះរបស់ស្ថាប័ន USCIS ។ តាមពិតទៅ វាមិនមែនបាត់នោះទេ ប៉ុន្តែគឺវាជាប់ នៅក្នុងគំនរឯកសារកកស្ទះរបស់ស្ថាប័ន USCIS ។ ដូច្នេះហើយ ប្រសិនបើយើងទទួលបានពាក្យធានាសំរាប់ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 មុន យើងនឹងដំណើរការទិដ្ឋាការនេះមុន ប៉ុន្តែប្រសិនបើយើងទទួលបានពាក្យធានាសំរាប់ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទអន្តោប្រវេសន៍សំរាប់ប្តីប្រពន្ធមុន យើងនឹងដំណើរការទិដ្ឋាការនេះមុន ហើយយើងនឹងទុកពាក្យសុំទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3ជាមោឃៈ» ។ នេះជារឿងដ៏សំខាន់ ពីព្រោះតួនាទីរបស់មជ្ឈមណ្ឌលទិដ្ឋាការជាតិក្នុងដំណើរការទិដ្ឋាការអន្តោប្រវេសន៍ មានលក្ខណៈខុសពីទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K ។ សំរាប់ទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K មជ្ឈមណ្ឌលទិដ្ឋាការជាតិ គ្រាន់តែផ្ញើឯកសារសំណុំរឿងនោះទៅកាន់ស្ថានទូតដែលពាក់ព័ន្ធ ហើយស្ថានទូតនឹងដំណើរការសំណុំរឿងនោះតាមដំណើរការរបស់ស្ថានកុងស៊ុល ។ ចំណែកឯក្នុងសំណុំរឿងទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទអន្តោប្រវេសន៍វិញ ដំណើរការរបស់មជ្ឈមណ្ឌលទិដ្ឋាការជាតិមានសភាពយឺតយ៉ាវ ព្រោះមជ្ឈមណ្ឌលទិដ្ឋាការជាតិត្រូវធ្វើការទទួលយកឯកសារនិងបញ្ចូលពត៌មាន ហើយខ្ញុំមិននិយាយថាមជ្ឈមណ្ឌលនេះធ្វើការសំរេចចេញទិដ្ឋាការនោះទេ ប៉ុន្តែពួកគេធ្វើការត្រួតពិនិត្យដោយល្អិតល្អន់ ដើម្បីធានាអោយប្រាកដថា ពួកគេមានពត៌មានគ្រប់គ្រាន់ដើម្បីបន្តដំណើរការ និងដាក់ថ្ងៃណាត់សំភាស ។ ដូច្នេះប្រសិនបើអ្នកអាចដាក់ពាក្យសុំទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ហើយត្រូវបានគេសំរេចយល់ព្រមលើពាក្យសុំ នោះទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 នេះនៅតែដំណើរការលឿនជាងទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទអន្តោប្រវេសន៍ ។ ទោះបីជាយ៉ាងណាក៏ដោយ ខ្ញុំនៅតែយល់ថា មជ្ឈមណ្ឌលទិដ្ឋាការជាតិនៅតែរក្សាគោលនយោបាយបិទតាមបែបរដ្ឋបាល ដែលពួកគេត្រូវដំណើរការសំណុំរឿងអន្តោប្រវេសន៍មុន ។ ឥឡូវនេះ ការដំណើរការសំណុំរឿងអន្តោប្រវេសន៍ជាពិសេសគឺសំណុំរឿងប្ដីឬប្រពន្ធរបស់ពលរដ្ឋអាមេរិក ត្រូវបានកាត់បន្ថយយ៉ាងច្រើន ។ ស្ថាប័ន USCIS បានចាត់វិធានការសំខាន់ៗជាច្រើនដើម្បីធ្វើអោយនិតិវិធីរបស់ពួកគេកាន់តែមានប្រសិទ្ធិភាព ហើយពួកគេបានធ្វើវាអោយកាន់តែមានប្រសិទ្ធិភាពឡើង ។ ខ្ញុំគិតថាពួកគេមានបុគ្គលិកច្រើនជាងមុន ហើយក៏មានរឿងច្រើនដែរដែលត្រូវដោះស្រាយពាក់ព័ន្ធនឹងសំណុំរឿងទាំងនោះ ហើយពួកគេក៏មានធនធានជាច្រើនដែរដើម្បីអោយសំណុំរឿងទាំងអស់នោះបានដំណើរការទៅមុខ ដែលជាលទ្ធផល គឺខ្ញុំមិននិយាយថាទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទ K-3 ផុតសម័យលែងត្រូវបានគេប្រើប្រាស់នោះទេ ប៉ុន្តែគឺវាលែងសូវចាំបាច់ក្នុងការប្រើប្រាស់ដូចកាលពីពេលដែលវាត្រូវបានបង្កើតពីដំបូងនោះទេ ។ ដោយសារមូលហេតុនេះហើយ ទើបខ្ញុំគិតថាអ្នកអាចនឹងឃើញសំណុំរឿងទិដ្ឋាការប្រភេទK-3 កាន់តែតិចទៅៗដែលនឹងត្រូវដំណើរការនៅក្នុងប្រទេសកម្ពុជា ឬប្រទេសផ្សេងៗទៀត ។
21st November 2017
K-3 Marriage Visas From Cambodia
Posted by : admin
The following is a transcript of the video which can be found here: K-3 Visas from Cambodia.
In this video today, we are going to specifically discuss one visa that is sort of an interesting little niche visa, the K-3 visa, in the specific context of a Khmer, Cambodian national who would be seeking that in connection with marriage to a US citizen. Let’s be clear, you have got to be married to a US citizen in order to apply for a K-3.
First things first. As previously noted in my preamble, we’re located here in Bangkok. We do deal with a large number of Thai cases but being fairly geographically close to Cambodia, over the years we’ve done a fair number of Cambodian cases or cases that arise with a Cambodian national, a Khmer national involved. That being stated, it should be noted that the K-3 is an interesting animal.
To provide a little background on what the K-3 visa is. The K-3 visa was created pursuant to the provisions of the LIFE act created under the Clinton presidency and it was created at a time when the back log associated with spousal visas, CR-1 and IR-1, and there’s another video on this channel specific to CR-1 and IR-1 visas, in Cambodia. Basically, at the time, it was taking multiple years to get finalized Department of Homeland secure the approval of the petition for marriage visas. Meanwhile, at the same time it was like 6 or 7 months, 8 months to get a fiancée visa petition approved. So you ended up with the sort of counter intuitive situation where fiancées were moving through the system more quickly than spouses and it should be noted that from a legal perspective there is no qualitative difference as far as the law is concerned, specifically Immigration law is concerned, with respect to a fiancée versus a spouse; from a legal standpoint they’re treated the same way. From an administrative standpoint, they just had a high back log of marriage visas or marriage petitions, for whatever reason, were they were processing K-1s more efficiently or they just had a lower case load, I don’t know what the deal was, but at the time it was taking multiple years to get a petition for marriage to an American citizen process through and meanwhile it was taking a matter of months for fiancées. So what happened is they created this K-3 category and the K-3 category was created, basically they said “look if you have got a petition on file for a spousal visa benefits in the normal manner, the CR-1 or IR-1 category basically, you can take that filing and do a duplicative version of that and go ahead and file for this K-3 category. You just go ahead and file it again through the K line. That’s basically what they did. They just took these marriage visa cases and said – Okay, it’s been filed, you have got to prove it’s filed and you put it in the line that was processing for fiancées so what ended up happening is K-3 has kind of become the ubiquitous term for a US marriage visa but in point of fact, the traditional methodology of bringing someone into the United States is through a CR-1 or IR-1 visa. The K-3 just sort of became rather common place in the lexicon of these matters because people got used to dealing with K-3s because that was effectively the way to get your spouse into the United States. It’s interesting because K-3 still requires adjustment of status to lawful permanent residence. Those of you who are interested in learning about that, in order to get a green card you have to undergo the adjustment of status process and I urge you to take a look at the video that specifically discusses the adjustment of status process on this channel, but something to bring up with respect to K-3s in the present context. Although they may be useful under present processing conditions, in the past there was an administrative ruling, it was a policy of administrative closure that was undertaken by the National Visa Center whereby they basically said – “Look, the K-3 was created for these situations where basically a marriage visa, an immigrant visa case got lost in the back log of USCIS. Not lost but stuck in the back log of USCIS. So if we got the K-3 position first we will process through on the K-3. But if we get the petition for the Immigrant Spouse Visa first, we’re going to process the Immigrant Spouse Visa benefits. We’re going to disregard the K-3”. This is important because NVC’s function is qualitatively different in an immigrant visa context that it is in a K Visa context. The K Visa context, NVC just shoots the case on to the embassy in question and the embassy sort of deals with all the nuts and bolts of the consular processing. In an immigrant visa context, the NVC process is slower because NVC deals with the nuts and bolts of document intake and in a way, I won’t say, adjudication but sort of pre vetting to make sure that they have generally what they need to go ahead and continue to process and get an interview scheduled. So in a way, the K-3 may still, if you can go ahead and get one through, the K-3 may still process more quickly compared to an immigrant visa but it’s my understanding that NVC still maintains the policy of administrative closure, where they get the immigrant case first and now processing of immigrant matters, immigrant spouse matters of American citizens, has reduced significantly. USCIS, to their credit, took significant substantial steps to make their process more efficient and they streamlined it, and I think they got more staff and things to deal with those matters and they put more resources on getting those cases processed, and as a result, in a way the K-3 is, I won’t say it’s obsolete, but its original reason for being there is not quite so pressing as it was at the time that it was created. And for that reason, I think it’s very probable that you are going to see fewer and fewer K-3 visas being processed in Cambodia or elsewhere.
18th March 2011
It recently came to this blogger’s attention that the Cambodian government has changed some of the regulations regarding registration of marriage in that Kingdom. To quote directly from a recent posting on the blog United Khmer:
MALE foreigners over the age of 50 have been outlawed from marrying Cambodian women in the country under new rules designed to crack down on sham marriages and human trafficking, the government said today.
Human trafficking is a serious issue in many Asian nations including those comprising the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). The posting went on to further note:
Foreigners who earn less than $2,580 per month are also barred from wedding local women, foreign ministry spokesman Koy Kuong told AFP, but the restrictions do not apply to weddings taking place overseas.
It would seem as though the Cambodian government is also attempting to make rules in an attempt to ensure that those Cambodian women marrying foreign men are more likely to be materially provided for.
It is increasingly common for both men and women from the United States of America to travel to Southeast Asian nations such as Cambodia, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, Myanmar (Burma), Laos, Malaysia, and Singapore for both business matters and pleasure. In some cases, American Citizens traveling abroad meet someone special and decide to bring their loved one back to the United States. Under such circumstances, it will likely be required that the foreign loved one obtain a United States visa.
Depending upon the unique facts of each given case couples may opt to apply for a US fiance visa (officially classified as a K-1 visa) or a spousal visa such as a CR-1 visa or, less commonly, a non-immigrant K-3 visa. Those couples who have been married for more than 2 years at the time of their admission to the United States are likely to see the prospective immigrant spouse admitted into the USA in IR-1 visa status.
The immigration process is a different experience for each couple and as the process evolves it also constantly changes. For this reason (likely amongst many others) some couples opt to retain the assistance of a professional to provide insight into the protocols associated with United States immigration. Under those circumstances, those seeking advice and counsel are well advised to ascertain the credentials of anyone claiming to be an American attorney as only a licensed attorney from the United States is permitted to practice United States Immigration law.
For related information please see: US tourist visa.
Pages
Archives
- June 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- April 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
Categories
- Adjustment of Status (51)
- American Business (27)
- American Institute Taiwan (33)
- arrest warrant (2)
- ASEAN Business (84)
- ASEAN Visa (22)
- Australian Migration (1)
- Brazil Business (2)
- Cambodia Business (26)
- China Business (51)
- Comprehensive Immigration Reform (16)
- CR1 Visa (147)
- Department of Homeland Security (99)
- Transportation Security Administration (TSA) (10)
- USCBP (39)
- USICE (23)
- E1 visa (13)
- E2 Visa (17)
- EB-1 Visa (7)
- EB-2 Visa (7)
- EB-3 Visa (7)
- EB-4 Visa (7)
- EB5 Visa (34)
- Ecommerce (6)
- Editorial (24)
- Election 2012 (6)
- F1 Visa Thailand (25)
- Fiance Visa Thailand (178)
- Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) (3)
- Gaming Law (7)
- General Legal Information (115)
- I-601 Waiver (24)
- India Business (7)
- Indonesia Business (6)
- IR1 Visa (114)
- J1 visa (15)
- J1 Visa Thailand (29)
- K-3 Visa Thailand (160)
- K1 Visa (195)
- K2 Visa (104)
- K1 Visa Thailand (212)
- K2 Visa Thailand (77)
- K3 Visa (158)
- L1 Visa (36)
- Laos Business (22)
- Legal News (19)
- Thailand Legal News (12)
- Legal Opinion (107)
- Legal Process Outsourcing (5)
- lgbt immigration (97)
- same sex visa (95)
- Malaysia Business (14)
- Miscellaneous (107)
- Myanmar (Burma) Business (19)
- National Visa Center (47)
- News (86)
- Online Gaming (7)
- Opinion (29)
- prenuptial agreement (3)
- Russia Business (6)
- South Africa Business (3)
- T Visa (1)
- Thai Family Law (24)
- Thailand Business (158)
- Thailand company (35)
- Amity Treaty (20)
- Thailand Condo (11)
- Thailand Customs (1)
- Thailand Embassy (20)
- Thailand Marriage Registration (22)
- Thailand Notary (3)
- Thailand Property (39)
- Thailand Real Estate (39)
- Thailand Visa (153)
- Thailand Work Permit (16)
- Upcoming Legislation (61)
- US Business (27)
- US Company Registration (13)
- US LLC (9)
- US Citizenship (27)
- US Constitution (22)
- States' Rights (16)
- US Consulate HCMC (70)
- US Emassy Mongolia (10)
- US Embassy Afghanistan (4)
- US Embassy Kabul (4)
- US Embassy Australia (35)
- us embassy bangkok (178)
- US Embassy Bangladesh (51)
- US Embassy Dhaka (51)
- US Embassy Brunei Darussalam (10)
- US Embassy Burma (90)
- US Embassy Myanmar (86)
- US Embassy Rangoon (84)
- US Embassy Yangon (84)
- US Embassy Cambodia (85)
- US Embassy China (64)
- US Consulate ChengDu (52)
- US Consulate Guangzhou (53)
- US Consulate Hong Kong (28)
- US Consulate Macau (28)
- US Consulate Shanghai (53)
- US Consulate Shenyang (53)
- US Consulate Wuhan (52)
- US Embassy Beijing (51)
- US Embassy Fiji (39)
- US Embassy Kiribati (38)
- US Embassy Nauru (38)
- US Embassy Suva (38)
- US Embassy Tonga (38)
- US Embassy Tuvalu (37)
- US Embassy India (81)
- US Consulate Chennai (49)
- US Consulate Hyderabad (48)
- US Consulate Kolkata (48)
- US Consulate Mumbai (47)
- US Embassy New Dehli (71)
- US Embassy Indonesia (72)
- US Embassy Jakarta (71)
- US Embassy Iraq (23)
- US Embassy Japan (52)
- US Embassy Kyrgyz Republic (Kyrgyzstan) (9)
- US Embassy Laos (51)
- US Embassy Malaysia (74)
- US Embassy Maldives (44)
- US Embassy Mauritius (33)
- US Embassy Mongolia (33)
- US Embassy Nepal (71)
- US Embassy Kathmandu (69)
- US Embassy New Zealand (35)
- US Embassy Pakistan (28)
- US Embassy Islamabad (27)
- US Embassy Papua New Guinea (42)
- US Embassy Philippines (45)
- US Embassy Manila (44)
- US Embassy Russia (13)
- US Embassy Singapore (69)
- US Embassy South Korea (44)
- US Embassy Sri Lanka (45)
- US Embassy Tokyo (49)
- US Embassy Turkmenistan (8)
- US Embassy Uzbekistan (8)
- US Embassy Vietnam (78)
- US Consulate HCMC (1)
- US Embassy Hanoi (75)
- US State Department (64)
- US Mission ASEAN (9)
- US Taxes (7)
- US Tourist Visa (69)
- US Visa (97)
- US Visa and Immigration (414)
- US Embassy Thailand (187)
- US Consulate Chiang Mai (120)
- US Embassy Thailand (187)
- US Visa Thailand (299)
- US Warrants (20)
- Extradition (13)
- USCIS (184)
- Vietnam Business (11)
- Visa Waiver (39)
- Weird Law (8)
- ข่าวกฎหมาย (1)
- ข่าวในพม่า (2)
- ธุรกิจในนพม่า (2)
- ตลาดหลักทรัพย์กัมพูชา (1)
- ธุรกิจกัมพูชา (1)
- ธุรกิจในกัมพูชา (1)
- ธุรกิจในประเทศจีน (6)
- ธุรกิจในประเทศลาว (2)
- ธุรกิจในอาเซียน (1)
- ธูรกิจในประเทศไทย (6)
- บริการทางกฎหมายจีน (2)
- บริษัทอเมริกัน (5)
- ธุรกิจในอเมริกา (2)
- ภาษีอเมริกัน (1)
- วีซ่าคู่เพศเดียวกัน (3)
- วีซ่าไทย (1)
- โนตารี (1)
- ้วีซ่าอเมริกาจากประเทศไทย (59)
-
RSS Feeds
The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisement. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience. The information presented on this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.