Integrity Legal

The Treaty of Amity between the United States of America and the Kingdom of Thailand (US-Thai Treaty of Amity) allows American Citizens to own virtually one hundred percent of a Thai company. This can prove highly beneficial to American expatriates in Thailand who wish to conduct business. That being said, there are restrictions to the types of activity that an Amity Treaty Company can undertake. Most notable amongst the restricted activities are: land ownership, internal communications, internal transportation, fiduciary functions, and the liberal professions.

Under Thai law, there is a de facto prohibition placed upon foreigners when it comes to land ownership. This means that foreign nationals are not permitted to take freehold title to Thai property without first obtaining permission from the Thai Minister of the Interior. This prohibition is not all-encompassing as foreign nationals are permitted to take freehold title to Thai condominiums. However, the condominium complex must comport to the relevant provisions of the Thai Condominium Act. Most notable among the requirements in the Thai Condominium Act is the provision that a Thai condo complex must be primarily owned by Thai nationals, meaning that 51% of the Condo units must be owned by Thais while 49% percent of the units may be owned by foreigners.

In many cases, a condominium complex is owned by a company in Thailand. Some opt to own a condo in this way in order to make selling the condominium easier, while others initially purchase the condo indirectly through a corporate entity. In either case, the practice is technically legal. Although, use of so-called “nominee shareholders,” is illegal in Thailand and Thai authorities are increasingly on the lookout for corporate structures utilizing nominees. That being said, the definition of “nominee” is somewhat vague.

This leads us back to the issue of Amity Treaty Companies. Amity Companies are specifically precluded from ownership of Thai real estate pursuant to the provisions of the Treaty of Amity, while the Thai Condominium Act allows foreigners to own a Condominium outright. This begs the question: can an Amity Treaty Company own a Thai Condo in the same manner as a foreign natural person could? This author has not adequately settled this question in his own mind and welcomes any comments regarding this issue. The provisions of the Treaty of Amity preclude land ownership and although many believe that Condo ownership is simply ownership of a unit, the Chanote does pass title to an interest in the underlying land, so there would seem to be a compelling argument that a condo owner is something of a landowner and, if so, this practice would likely be precluded under the provisions of the Amity Treaty.

Tags: Amity Treaty, Amity Treaty Company, nominee, nominee shareholder, nominees, Thai Company, Thai Condo, Thai Condominium, Thai Real Estate, Thailand Condo, Thailand Condominium, Thailand Real Estate, Thailand Treaty of Amity, US-Thai Treaty of Amity
Posted in Amity Treaty, Thailand Business, Thailand company, Thailand Condo, Thailand Property, Thailand Real Estate | No Comments »

Many people in Thailand, both foreign and Thai, choose to incorporate Thai businesses. Thailand is one of Southeast Asia’s major trading locales and as a result many individuals and business concerns need a corporate presence in the Kingdom of Thailand. In many cases, companies are incorporated with substantially similar articles of incorporation. That being said, some companies opt to incorporate with unique provisions regarding different types of shareholder rights in the corporate charter. These different types of rights can have a major impact upon the running of the business because these rights can have a collateral impact upon employee compensation, shareholder vote tabulation, and banking issues. Therefore, an understanding of share classification can be helpful to those who are thinking of incorporating a Thai company.

In the articles of association (also known as articles of incorporation) of a Thai limited company, one could denote the rights associated with different share classifications. Therefore, some shares could simply hold an equity interest in the company while not having any voting rights at shareholder meetings. Other types of shares could hold little or no equity in the company, but maintain voting rights regarding the Directors of the company. If a company owns Thai property, there could be specific shares that have certain rights in relation to the Thai property concerned. For example, a Thai company that owns Thai real estate could place special rights in the hands of certain shareholders with regard to said real estate. If a Thai company owns a Thai Condo, then share classification could be used to delineate the rights of individuals with regard to the Condo premises.

For those who are interested in Thai limited companies certified under the US-Thai Amity Treaty, these same principals could apply to an Amity Company. One shareholder could retain a sizable equity holding while another holds certain voting rights. The same could be said about a Thai limited company that has obtained a Foreign Business License. A company such as this could incorporate special shareholder rights in the provisions of the articles of association or incorporation.

These issues bleed into the realm of Thai Immigration because the shareholder in a Thai company could apply for a Thai business visa. The basis for such an application could be an impending shareholder’s meeting that the foreign national must attend. The approval of such an application would depend upon the Thai Embassy or Consulate concerned. If present in the Kingdom on another type of visa, an O visa, for example, it may be possible for the shareholder to attend a meeting in order to vote his or her shares.

Tags: Amity Treaty, Amity Treaty Company, Corporate Law, Limited Company Thailand, Shareholder Classification, Thai Company, Thai Limited Company, Thailand company, Thailand limited company, Treaty of Amity Company, US-Thai Amity Treaty, Voting Rights
Posted in Amity Treaty, Thailand Business, Thailand company, Thailand Condo, Thailand Embassy, Thailand Property, Thailand Real Estate, Thailand Visa | 22 Comments »

Thailand has become a major epicenter of trade in Southeast Asia. The Kingdom also remains one of the most important trading partners of the United States of America, the European Union, and the United Kingdom. Many businesspeople who do business in Thailand must deal with restrictions imposed upon foreigners under the Thai Foreign Business Act. American Citizens enjoy some benefits under the provisions of the US-Thai Amity Treaty. This Treaty was promulgated in the mid-60′s. In Thailand, Treaties are considered the “law of the land,” and are considered superior to locally drafted legislation (this notion is similar to many of the ideas codified in the American Constitution, specifically the Supremacy Clause).  As the Amity Treaty is the “law of the land,” it supersedes the Foreign Business Act.

A Thai Limited Company certified under the provisions of the Treaty of Amity is a good vehicle for conducting business in Thailand, but the Treaty does have caveats and Companies conducting certain types of business cannot obtain Treaty Certification. Most importantly for some, Amity Treaty Companies cannot own land. Even though an Amity Company is accorded “National Treatment,” the company is barred from holding property in the form of Thai Real Estate. Although, technically it may be possible for an Amity company to purchase a Condo in Thailand.

Aside from ownership of Thai property, there are other activities which an Amity Company cannot engage in, such as: Inland Transportation, Communications, Fiduciary Functions, and the Practice of Professions. Each of these types of activity are reserved to Thai nationals and/or Thai Companies. Even still, the Amity Treaty provides American Citizens with the opportunity to own virtually 100% of a Thai company. For many types of businesses the Amity Treaty is a perfect solution to the problems imposed upon foreigners by the Foreign Business Act.

Some have postulated regarding the possibility of using American Citizens as nominees in order to obtain Amity Treaty benefits. This is basically impossible as nominee shareholders are illegal under current Thai law. That being said, delineating whether or not an American Company is “American,” could be difficult. The relevant agencies of the Thai Ministry of Commerce adjudicate Amity Treaty Certification applications on a case by case basis and come to a decision based upon the makeup of the corporate shareholders in question.

An Amity Treaty Certificate is somewhat similar to a Foreign Business License. However, the two documents are issued based upon different legal foundations. There are some US Immigration benefits accorded to Thai nationals under the US-Thai Treaty of Amity in the form of E visas, but there is not a direct counterpart found under Thai Immigration law.

Tags: Amity Treaty, Amity Treaty Company, Thai Company, Thai Limited Company, Thailand company, Thailand limited company, Treaty of Amity, Treaty of Amity Company, US-Thai Amity Treaty, US-Thai Treaty of Amity
Posted in General Legal Information, Thailand Business, Thailand company, Thailand Condo, Thailand Property, Thailand Real Estate, US Visa and Immigration | 5 Comments »

Thailand is one of the major trading centers in Southeast Asia. As a result, many foreign nationals wish to conduct business in the Kingdom of Thailand. However, the Thailand Foreign Business Act precludes foreign ownership of Thai companies. Strictly speaking, foreign ownership is not technically illegal, but operating such a company for profit is against the law.

When we say, “foreign ownership,” we mean foreign majority ownership as foreign nationals are allowed to own a minority stake in a Thai company, up to forty-nine percent. If a Thai owns fifty-one percent of a company in Thailand, then that company is considered to be a “Thai Company.”

There are some who incorporate “Thai companies” that utilize so-called “nominee shareholders.” A nominee is one who owns shares in a Thai company on behalf of another. A nominee is not an “active shareholder,” in a company. Under current Thai corporate law nominee shareholders are illegal. However, defining what constitutes a “nominee shareholder,” can be difficult.

Thai law does provide for a way around the restrictions imposed by the Foreign Business Act. There are ways to license a Thai Company, with majority foreign ownership, to conduct business in Thailand.

On method of facilitating a foreign company to conduct business in Thailand is through a Foreign Business License. These documents can be difficult to obtain and the process for obtaining a Thai foreign business license can be very time consuming. Once granted the license will specify the exact nature of the business and the company will be precluded from conducting any other type of activity, unless another license is obtained.

Another method of facilitating foreign ownership of a Thai company is through the US-Thai Amity Treaty. As the name suggests, the US-Thai Treaty of Amity and Economic Relations is a bilateral agreement between the Kingdom of Thailand and the United States of America. A company certified under the terms of the Treaty is given “national treatment,” allowing it to operate in the same way as a “Thai Company.” The major exception being that an Amity Treaty Company is precluded from owning real estate in Thailand. Other types of Thai property could be owned by an Amity Company, such as a Thai Condo. Also, the provisions of the Treaty grant the aforementioned benefits exclusively to United States Citizens. Therefore, this method of certification is not for everyone.

The Australia-Thai free trade agreement provides some special benefits to Australians in Thailand as Australian Citizen may be allowed to own a majority stake in certain types of Thai companies.

A final method of licensing a foreign company in Thailand is through the Board of Investment or BOI. A BOI company can receive special benefits in the form of rights to operate and some BOI companies can own land. That being said, BOI companies are very difficult to incorporate and require a great deal of legal expertise to set up. BOI Companies are generally not advisable for those thinking of establishing a small Thai business. For large enterprises, such a setup may be advisable due to the fact that a Thailand visa and/or work permit is generally easier to obtain for a BOI company.

Tags: Amity Company, Amity Treaty, Amity Treaty Company, Board of Investment Company, Board of Investment Thailand, BOI Company, Foreign Business License Thailand, Thai Company, Thai Foreign Business License, Thailand company, Thailand Company Incorporation, Thailand Company Setup, Thailand Foreign Business License, US-Thai Amity Treaty, US-Thai Treaty of Amity
Posted in Legal Opinion, Miscellaneous, Thailand Business, Thailand company, Thailand Condo, Thailand Property, Thailand Real Estate, Thailand Visa | No Comments »

The E2 visa is a special non-immigrant visa available to prospective investors who are also citizens of countries with a trade or commercial treaty with the United States of America. Citizens of the Kingdom of Thailand can apply for E2 visa status as the United States and the Kingdom of Thailand, at the time of this writing, maintain a Treaty of Amity and Commerce.

In order to qualify for an E2 visa the applicant must invest a “substantial amount” of money into the American economy in the form of a business venture. Although not specifically defined in the statutes or treaties, the term “substantial amount” has been largely left to be determined by the Consular officers posted at the US Embassy or Consulate where the visa application is being submitted. Although information regarding the necessary amount of money varies, a minimum investment of at least one hundred thousand dollars should be available for investment before a prospective applicant should contemplate submitting an application. That being said, the investment will be viewed in relation to the overall enterprise. As a result, a one hundred thousand dollar investment may be viewed as substantial if one is setting up a small restaurant in a region with a relatively low cost of living. However, that same amount of money will probably not be viewed as “substantial” if one is seeking to undertake the construction of a shopping mall in a heavily urban area. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Service utilizes an ‘Inverted Sliding Scale’ in order to make determinations as to whether or not the underlying investment should be considered “substantial” in relation to the total cost of the economic endeavor.

Another issue that must be considered when discussing the E2 visa is the fact that the business investment ought to create employment opportunities for American Citizens. Although it is probably more desirable to hire American workers before the submission of the E2 application. Providing evidence that employment opportunities will come about in the reasonably foreseeable  future is usually sufficient for approval of at least the initial application.
Another visa category that is generally of interest to those researching the E2 is the L1 visa. The L1 visa is a non-immigrant visa category that employs the dual intent doctrine to allow foreign employees of an international company to transfer to a US-based affiliate for the purpose of carrying out business activity in the United States. In some cases, an already established foreign corporation will wish to establish a presence in the United States. In order to staff the new company, foreign managers and executives will need travel documents to travel and work in the United States.

For related information please see our page on the establishment of an Amity Treaty Company

Tags: American Visa, Amity Treaty Company, E 2 Visa, E2 Visa, L1 Visa, Treaty of Amity, us embassy bangkok, us embassy thailand, US Visa Thailand
Posted in General Legal Information, Legal Opinion, Miscellaneous, us embassy bangkok, US Embassy Thailand, US Visa and Immigration, US Visa Thailand | No Comments »

The government of the Kingdom of Thailand has announced that they will be launching investigations into the buying of agricultural Thai real estate by foreign nationals in the Kingdom of Thailand.  Apparently there have been rumblings among the Thai farming community concerning an influx of foreigners buying land in Thailand in order to grow crops for eventual sale on the open market.

Many individuals are concerned that a foreigner will use a Thai company to own land and thereby circumvent the laws on the books regarding foreign real estate ownership. The Nation Newspaper in conjunction with ThaiVisa.com is reporting on the issue, to quote their article:

“Concerned Thai officials will continue monitoring whether foreigners have violated law on buying or renting farmland to engage in agriculture in the kingdom although initial investigation found that such a practice does not exist, Deputy Commerce Minister Alongkorn Ponlaboot said on Saturday…Farming as an occupation is reserved for Thais only and the probe was conducted following an outcry by some farmers that foreigners have bought numerous plots of farmland here and hired farmers to provide the labour.”

People moving to Thailand or wishing to live part time in the Kingdom should be aware of the somewhat xenophobic attitude of many Thai people when it comes to the subject of Thai property law. Regulations regarding Thai real estate reflect a negative attitude toward foreign ownership of Thai property. Many Thai people consider Thai property ownership to be a right that ought to be held in reserve for Thai citizens. That being said, there are exceptions to this general mood. Most Thai people do not see a problem allowing foreign nationals to own a Thai Condo in freehold. Further, obtaining a Yellow Tabien Baan (foreign house registration booklet) is becoming somewhat commonplace. However, this nonchalance does not extend to feelings regarding ownership of farm land and Thai government policy is a reflection of these feelings.

Evidence of this attitude can be found throughout the Thai foreign business act. A Thai company that is owned by a foreign national is specifically barred from engaging in business activities involving Thai farming. Even the US-Thai Treaty of Amity specifically precludes land ownership and agricultural activity. An Amity Treaty Company, although accorded preferential “national treatment,” is still subject to somewhat stringent regulation regarding Thai agriculture.

With the current global economy still in a somewhat less than optimal condition, it seems logical to assume that these restrictive measures will remain part of the law of the Kingdom of Thailand. It does not seem likely that the Thai government will allow foreigners to engage in farming activities in the near future.

Tags: Amity Company, Amity Treaty Company, Tabien Baan, Thai Company, Thai Farm land, Thailand Property Law, Thailand Real Estate Law, US-Thai Treaty of Amity
Posted in General Legal Information, Legal Opinion, Thailand Business, Thailand Property, Thailand Real Estate | No Comments »

On this blog and in other places on our site we have discussed the US-Thai Amity Treaty and how it can be beneficial for those doing business in the Kingdom of Thailand. However, most of these writings have made the assumption that one would be setting up a Thai Limited Company as an entity certified by the Foreign business office as protected under the Treaty.

One aspect Thai corporate law that is of some interest to American operators in Thailand is the notion of establishing a sole proprietorship and obtaining Amity Treaty certification. In theory, this is possible, although in practice it can be somewhat difficult to arrange and has some drawbacks from a legal viewpoint.

One positive aspect of Treaty Certification on a sole proprietorship is the fact that income garnered by the sole proprietor can be taxed as if it were personal income. Therefore, issues of so-called “double taxation” do not come into play when dealing with some sole proprietorships. Also, with regard to a sole proprietorship the paperwork necessary to establish the entity is far less substantial. In the case of proper Thai limited companies, it may be necessary to promulgate meeting minutes of shareholders and directors. Sole proprietorships generally do not require meeting minutes because the sole proprietor is the only person with authority to make decisions on behalf of the company.

One of the major warnings that any legal professional will give to one seeking to establish a sole proprietorship is to think about the ramifications of a lack of limited liability. Sole proprietorships do not have limited liability and therefore, should an adversely affected party wish to sue the sole proprietorship, then the sole proprietor’s personal assets could be placed in jeopardy. Thai limited companies do not have unlimited liability which means that should one sue the company, then the company would only be liable up to the amount of their registered capital.

Finally, from a practical standpoint there are some professions for which a foreigner cannot obtain a work permit to perform. Therefore, it may be possible to set up a sole proprietorship to engage in the entertainment business, but not be able to get a Thai work permit in order to perform the activities inherent to the business. In some ways setting up a limited company sidesteps this problem because the Thai company is viewed as a separate legal entity in the eyes of the law and therefore, the activities that the company engages in may not be the same as the foreigner’s actual job within the organization. Therefore, the Ministry of Labour might authorize the work permit for one working for a Thai Limited Company with Amity Treaty Certification.

(Nothing contained herein should be acted upon as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created between author and reader.)

Tags: Amity Treaty, Amity Treaty Company, Thai Company, Thailand company, Thailand company registration, US-Thai Treaty of Amity
Posted in General Legal Information, Thailand Business | No Comments »

The US-Thai Treaty of Amity is an agreement between the Kingdom of Thailand and the United States of America that provides benefits for Thai investors and businessmen in the USA and also provides economic benefits to Americans in Thailand. The most important benefit conferred by the Treaty of Amity is the right of Americans to form a Treaty of Amity Company. A Treaty of Amity Company is a corporate structure similar to a Thai limited company.

The major difference between a Thai limited company and an Amity Treaty company is the fact that an Amity Company can be one hundred percent owned by non-Thais provided the owners are American Citizens. Under Thai law there must be at least three shareholders, but one shareholder could virtually own the Amity Company outright by owning 99% of the shares in the company.  

The content written heretofore begs the question: why is American ownership such a big deal? For those unfamiliar with the Thai legal system, a statute known as the foreign business act stipulates that a Thai company must either be majority Thai owned or an application for a foreign business license will be necessary. Foreign business licenses are somewhat difficult to obtain. That being said, the Amity Treaty preceeds the Foreign Business act and its provisions supercede the foreign business act.

A major issue regarding the Treaty is the fact that it only applies to Americans. No other group of foreign nationals is accorded the same level of economic protection as that conferred upon Americans doing business in Thailand under the Thailand Treaty of Amity. As a result, many prospective business owners from nations other than the USA often ask if it is possible to utilize nominee American shareholders in a Thai company in order to meet the technical requirements of the US-Thai Treaty of Amity.

In theory, such a scenario was once possible. However, amendments to the foreign business act have made nominee shareholders expressly illegal. Also, the Foreign Business Office of Thailand has determined that only an American or a Thai is allowed to be the Managing Director of a company with protection under the US-Thai Amity Treaty.  The upshot of both of these rules is that, as a practical and legal matter, only Americans or Thais can own a majority position of a Thai company with Treaty benefits.

For more details about US-Thai Economic Relations please see: Amity Treaty Thailand

(Nothing herein is meant to act as in the place of competent legal advice from a licensed attorney. No Attorney-Client relationship shall be formed between the writer and any reader of this piece.)

Tags: Amity Company, Amity Treaty Company, Foreign Business Act, Foreign Business License, Thai LLC, Thailand limited company, US-Thai Treaty of Amity
Posted in Legal Opinion, Thailand Business | No Comments »