<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Integrity Legal Blog &#187; US Court DOMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/tag/us-court-doma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog</link>
	<description>Legal Blog Thailand by Integrity Legal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 19:31:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fate of DOMA and LGBT Immigration Rights Still Uncertain</title>
		<link>http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/lgbt-immigration/fate-of-doma-and-lgbt-immigration-rights-still-uncertain/</link>
		<comments>http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/lgbt-immigration/fate-of-doma-and-lgbt-immigration-rights-still-uncertain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 04:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[lgbt immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Full Faith and Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay K1 visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay us visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT K1 visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT US Visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex K1 visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States' Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uafa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniting American Families Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Court DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US LGBT Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/?p=2814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It should be noted that judicial intervention is not the only method available for those wishing to see same sex visa benefits accorded in the same manner for those in a same sex marriage or relationship as those in a different sex marriage or relationship. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent postings on this blog this author has discussed the <a title="Defense of Marriage Act" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/k1-visa/dedicated-us-legislators-continue-to-push-for-lgbt-immigration-legislation/" target="_blank">Defense of Marriage Act</a> (<a title="DOMA" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/lgbt-immigration/current-status-of-american-same-sex-immigration-legislation/" target="_blank">DOMA</a>) and the ongoing <a title="US Court" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/us-visa-immigration/commonwealth-of-massachusetts-v-the-usa-will-the-end-of-doma-mark-the-beginning-of-immigration-benefits-for-same-sex-couples/" target="_blank">US Court</a> proceedings that are aimed at overturning this legislation in order to accord same-sex bi-national couples with privileges equal to their different-sex counterparts. Recently, a Court in Massachusetts found that the provisions of DOMA run contrary to the United States Constitution. As a result, this decision could greatly modify the framework by which Immigration petitions are adjudicated. Apparently, the Court wishes to delay radical modification of US Immigration law and procedure until such time as all issues can be addressed in an appellate proceeding. It would appear that many same-sex bi-national couples are waiting with baited breathe to see the practical implications of the recent Court decision overturning certain aspects of DOMA. However, there is some delay as the Immigration Equality blog explains.  To <a title="quote" href="http://immigrationequality.org/blog/?p=2087" target="_blank">quote</a> directly from the Immigration Equality blog as of July 27, 2010:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><strong>Many of you have had questions about the status of the DOMA case. Just  like you, we are waiting for the court to issue an order which should be  happening any day now.  Once the order is issued, there will be an  automatic 14 day stay.  We are almost certain that during that 14 day  period, the government will file an appeal and we are almost certain  that the stay will remain in effect during the course of the appeal.   But we will keep you updated as soon as we learn of any further  developments. </strong></em></p></blockquote>
<p>Those reading this post are probably curious about the practical ramifications of the &#8220;stay&#8221; of this decision. The &#8220;stay&#8221; means that the current mechanism for adjudicating <a title="US Immigration" href="http://www.integrity-legal.com" target="_blank">US Immigration</a> petitions will remain in place, at least for now. Therefore, those Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents with a same sex loved one living abroad will still be unable to petition and apply for same sex family visa benefits pursuant to the provisions of DOMA. Many feel, and this author concurs, that the American appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court, are likely to find DOMA unconstitutional pursuant to American legal doctrines such as &#8220;<a title="Full Faith and Credit" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_Faith_and_Credit_Clause" target="_blank">Full Faith and Credit</a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a title="States' Rights" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States%27_rights" target="_blank">States&#8217; Rights</a>&#8220;. However, as the issue remains unresolved it is unwise for anyone to make any irrevocable decisions regarding US <a title="LGBT Immigration" href="http://www.integrity-legal.com/us-visa/same-sex-visa.html" target="_blank">LGBT Immigration</a> until a final judgment is handed down without reservation.</p>
<p>It should be noted that judicial intervention is not the only method available for those wishing to see <a title="same sex visa" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/us-visa-immigration/same_sex_us_visa/" target="_blank">same sex visa</a> benefits accorded in the same manner for those in a <a title="same sex marriage" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/us-visa-immigration/us-legislator-says-cir-would-not-be-truly-comprehensive-if-we-exclude-same-sex-couples/" target="_blank">same sex marriage</a> or relationship as those in a different sex marriage or relationship. The <a title="Uniting American Families Act" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/us-visa-immigration/nepal-to-legalize-same-sex-marriage-doma-still-remains-an-obstacle-to-same-sex-us-family-immigration/" target="_blank">Uniting American Families Act</a> (<a title="UAFA" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/us-visa-immigration/current-immigration-reform-bill-does-not-address-same-sex-visas/" target="_blank">UAFA</a>) would provide a statutory framework whereby same sex &#8220;permanent partners&#8221; could be granted the same Immigration benefits as those in a different-sex marriage or relationship. Although UAFA-like legislation has seen unfailing support from legislators such as <a title="Jerry Nadler" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/thailand-business/feingold-sought-to-introduce-doma-repeal-visa-implications/" target="_blank">Jerry Nadler</a>, many feel that the issue of LGBT Immigration rights will ultimately be adjudicated by the US Courts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/lgbt-immigration/fate-of-doma-and-lgbt-immigration-rights-still-uncertain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
