<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Integrity Legal Blog &#187; Transgendered Visa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/tag/transgendered-visa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog</link>
	<description>Legal Blog Thailand by Integrity Legal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 19:31:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Recent US Court Decision Significant Step Towards Equal LGBT Immigration Rights</title>
		<link>http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/lgbt-immigration/recent-us-court-decision-significant-step-towards-equal-lgbt-immigration-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/lgbt-immigration/recent-us-court-decision-significant-step-towards-equal-lgbt-immigration-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 01:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[lgbt immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bisexual Visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comprehensive Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lesbian Visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lgbt visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex us immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex us visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transgendered Visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uafa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniting American Families Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us immigration gay couple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us immigration lesbian couple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us visa gay couple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us visa lesbian couple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us visa same sex couple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us visa transgendered]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/?p=2723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Immigration Equality blog accurately noted, this decision does not mark the end of the pursuit for those seeking equal US immigration rights as, at the time of this writing, those seeking a US family visa based upon an LGBT relationship (sometimes referred to as a same sex visa) still cannot obtain visa benefits notwithstanding the recently promulgated decision.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog frequently discusses issues that are relevant to those who are in same-sex or LGBT relationships seeking United States immigration benefits for their loved ones overseas. In a posting on the blog <a title="Immigration Equality" href="http://immigrationequality.org/blog/?p=2061" target="_blank">Immigration Equality</a> the recently handed down decision in a <a title="Massachusetts Court case" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/us-visa-immigration/commonwealth-of-massachusetts-v-the-usa-will-the-end-of-doma-mark-the-beginning-of-immigration-benefits-for-same-sex-couples/" target="_blank">Massachusetts Court case</a> challenging the <a title="Defense of Marriage Act" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/us-visa-immigration/current-immigration-reform-bill-does-not-address-same-sex-visas/" target="_blank">Defense of Marriage Act</a> (<a title="DOMA" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/lgbt-immigration/current-status-of-american-same-sex-immigration-legislation/" target="_blank">DOMA</a>) was discussed. The following is a direct quote from the July 9th posting:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><em>Yesterday a Massachusetts federal district court judge sided with the  Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders and with the state of  Massachusetts and found that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/09/us/09marriage.html?_r=1&amp;ref=us">it  is unconstitutional for the U.S. federal government </a>to refuse to  recognize same sex marriages that are validly entered into in the  couple’s state.  This is a huge victory and we should all take a moment  to celebrate!  But, this battle is far from over. </em></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently, this ruling will not have a practical impact in the short term as the Court opted to &#8220;stay&#8221; the decision until the appeal process is exhausted.   The report went on to analyze the possible outcome should the United States Judicial Branch ultimately find that DOMA is unconstitutional:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><em>If, eventually, the Supreme Court upholds the ruling that DOMA is  unconstitutional, same sex couples that are validly married, would be  able to receive federal benefits, including immigration, based on their  marriage.  Basically, this would mean that binational couples who live  in the handful of states that allow same sex marriage could get  immigration benefits, and couples who live in states with mini-DOMAs  could not.</em></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Many feel that the main issue in this case is that of States&#8217; Rights. Presently, the United States government does not recognize the legality of a <a title="same sex marriage" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/us-visa-immigration/us-legislator-says-cir-would-not-be-truly-comprehensive-if-we-exclude-same-sex-couples/" target="_blank">same sex marriage</a> even where such a marriage was validly solemnized pursuant to the laws of a sovereign US state. This tension between the Federal and State power is often an issue in matters involving conflicting state and federal regulations. That said, where such conflict has an adverse impact upon individual rights, equal protection under the law, substantive due process, and Federal benefits, then the issue may be ripe for judicial review.</p>
<p>As the Immigration Equality blog accurately noted, this decision does not mark the end of the pursuit for those seeking equal <a title="US immigration" href="http://www.integrity-legal.com" target="_blank">US immigration</a> rights as, at the time of this writing, those seeking a <a title="US family visa" href="http://www.usfamilyvisa.com" target="_blank">US family visa</a> based upon an LGBT relationship (sometimes referred to as a <a title="same sex visa" href="http://www.integrity-legal.com/us-visa/same-sex-visa.html" target="_blank">same sex visa</a>) still cannot obtain visa benefits notwithstanding the recently promulgated decision.</p>
<p>Although a judicially created solution for same sex couples may not be available for a relatively long period of time, the passage of legislation similar to the <a title="Uniting American Families Act" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/us-visa-immigration/uafa_same_sex_us_immigration/" target="_blank">Uniting American Families Act</a> (<a title="UAFA" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/legal-information/obama-to-extend-federal-benefits-to-same-sex-couples-what-about-uafa/" target="_blank">UAFA</a>) either within the provisions of a <a title="Comprehensive Immigration Reform" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/us-visa-immigration/uscis-issues-notice-regarding-unused-family-based-visas/" target="_blank">Comprehensive Immigration Reform</a> Bill or as stand alone legislation could create a new family based visa category for &#8220;Permanent Partners&#8221; of US Citizens or Lawful Permanent Residents.</p>
<p>For those interested in learning more about US Immigration issues for same sex couples in Thai please see: <a title="LGBT immigration" href="http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/thailand-business/%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%82%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B7%E0%B8%AD%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%B4/" target="_blank">LGBT immigration</a>.<strong><em><br />
</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://integrity-legal.com/legal-blog/lgbt-immigration/recent-us-court-decision-significant-step-towards-equal-lgbt-immigration-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
